Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sickoflibs

While not agreeing with him everywhere. I am with him on most things. And most importantly, he is not beholden to defense contractors, big oil or Wall Street banks. He is mostly against crony capitalism on the republican side. And he is the only pure play on this issue. We could do far worse than Rand Paul.


4 posted on 04/07/2015 9:12:02 PM PDT by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: poinq; Impy; NFHale; GOPsterinMA; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj
RE:”And most importantly, he is not beholden to defense contractors, big oil or Wall Street banks. He is mostly against crony capitalism on the republican side. And he is the only pure play on this issue. We could do far worse than Rand Paul.”

He was doing OK politically for a while last year playing the populist but I was always skeptical of a first term Senator running and back in 2011 he walked into Rachel Maddow’s trap, ironically defending employers right to serve who they want, then denying he argued that under pressure. Now look where we are on that issue.

What did him in is ISIS and Iran, he sounds too much like Obama on them to win a GOP primary anytime soon.

8 posted on 04/07/2015 9:41:17 PM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: poinq
How do you know that he isn't beholden to those whom you've named, or even those you haven't named ? YOU DON'T !

As far as doing "worse"; that's really not saying much; especially since Rand is on par with wee barry on many issue and to wee barry's left on others.

9 posted on 04/07/2015 9:41:58 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: poinq

Right! Like I would trust him in negotiations with Putin! You can’t take a non-interventionist and turn him into a peaceful negotiator. He would unfortunately do foreign policy just like Obama - no thanks!


13 posted on 04/07/2015 11:15:57 PM PDT by Deagle (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: poinq

Sorry, I don’t trust him. He’s fine in the Senate, but as President? No thanks.


14 posted on 04/08/2015 12:01:12 AM PDT by Prince of Space (Be Breitbart, baby. LIFB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: poinq

“And most importantly, he is not beholden to defense contractors, big oil or Wall Street banks.”

While I agree with you on the Wall Street banks, if you think Big Oil and Defense Contractors are bad for this country, you are on the WRONG SITE to be saying that.

Most people here actually don’t mind cheap energy and the ability to stand up to the Soviets, Russians, and now Chinese.

Do you have a problem with that, or some other way to accomplish it?


16 posted on 04/08/2015 4:14:34 AM PDT by BobL (REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win (see my home page))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: poinq

“We could do far worse than Rand Paul.”

That is a sad commentary on the American electorate.


18 posted on 04/08/2015 6:31:11 AM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson