Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul on gay marriage: 'People ought to be treated fairly'
CNN ^ | 04/12/15 | Eric Bradner

Posted on 04/13/2015 11:56:02 AM PDT by thetallguy24

Washington (CNN)Rand Paul isn't endorsing same-sex marriage, but said Sunday that "people ought to be treated fairly under the law."

The Kentucky Republican senator who launched his 2016 presidential campaign this week talked about the semantics of marriage equality in an interview with CNN's Dana Bash on "State of the Union."

He said the decision on whether to allow same-sex marriage should be left to the states, and that he believes in "the traditional religious connotation" to marriage -- which religious conservatives believe should be reserved for one man and one woman.

"I also believe people ought to be treated fairly under the law," he said

"And you probably could have both," he said. "You could have both traditional marriage, which I believe in. And then you could also have the neutrality of the law that allows people to have contracts with another."

The issue could be a key one for Paul -- whose libertarian tendencies put him in stark contrast to Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton and could attract younger voters who are turned off by the GOP's socially conservative tendencies -- in the 2016 race.

Paul said he's a "leave me alone kind of guy."

He's also called for a less interventionist foreign policy than other leaders of both parties, and said Sunday that he'd like any increases in defense spending to be offset in cuts to domestic programs.

"I do believe people ought to be left alone," Paul said. "I don't care who you are or what you do at home or who your friends are or what, you know, where you hang out, what kind of music you listen to, what you do in your home is your own business. That's always been who I am."

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gop; homosexualagenda; libertarianagenda; president; republican; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
Paul again trying to use double speak
1 posted on 04/13/2015 11:56:02 AM PDT by thetallguy24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

What about pedophiles?


2 posted on 04/13/2015 11:57:30 AM PDT by WKTimpco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

RP is big on the Constitution supposedly.

The Constitution does not mention a word on marriage.

Marriage should therefore be regulated by the states if the Constitution still carries any weight.


3 posted on 04/13/2015 11:58:51 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKTimpco

“Paul said he’s a “leave me alone kind of guy.” “

Maybe he’s a “leave my member in the chute” kind of guy.


4 posted on 04/13/2015 11:59:06 AM PDT by WKTimpco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

Sodomite appeasement will get the Right nowhere! They are not satisfied with equal treatment. They have that now; each of them can marry the opposite gender if they so desire. In fact, they do not want equal treatment, they want “special” treatment. They are coming after our kids soon so brace yourselves...


5 posted on 04/13/2015 11:59:35 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

Children are evidently not people.
The primary purpose of marriage in society is to insure that the two people who conceive a child also raise the child who bears their genetic likeness.

It’s not a license to screw.


6 posted on 04/13/2015 11:59:47 AM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

And then there are those of us who don’t want this sexual deviancy BS shoved in our face or down our throat all of the time.


7 posted on 04/13/2015 12:00:39 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Just Say NO To Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

FURP!! Big tent RINO!!


8 posted on 04/13/2015 12:00:47 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKTimpco

Paul with his double speak yet again.

Rand the panderer and still some of his voters can’t face it.
So black have been pandered to.
Homosexuals been pandered to.
Illegals have been pandered to.
Druggies have been pandered to.

Paul why not challenge Clinton seeing as you are as left as her and a panderer?


9 posted on 04/13/2015 12:00:52 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WKTimpco

Apparently ... as long as they do it in their own homes ... it should be okay. That would be along with all the newly legalized drugs we get, too!


10 posted on 04/13/2015 12:01:42 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

A constitutional ammendment should have been passed on what constitutes a family. Otherwise all Hell breaks loose. What if Utah says a man can marry multiple wives? Or Kentucky says you can marry brothers and sisters?


11 posted on 04/13/2015 12:01:46 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

-— The primary purpose of marriage in society is to insure that the two people who conceive a child also raise the child who bears their genetic likeness. -—

THIS is the essence of the issue. Not whether Ben and Jerry can play house.

And this is why State sanctioning of marriage is justifiable.


12 posted on 04/13/2015 12:02:12 PM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WKTimpco

ah... but since when does “leave me alone” mean

“make us a cake or we’ll burn down your shop”

???


13 posted on 04/13/2015 12:02:12 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

“people ought to be treated fairly under the law.”

Perhaps he was talking about cake bakers, photographers, and florists?

Naaaaa...


14 posted on 04/13/2015 12:02:14 PM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Shame some of his pro druggies, pro homosexual, pro amnesty folks on here do not understand he is nothing but a Dem.


15 posted on 04/13/2015 12:02:18 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

I can just see it, though - some judge would rule that the amendment was unconstitutional and therefore void.


16 posted on 04/13/2015 12:03:04 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WKTimpco

forgot to add to that list.

College should be tax deducted he said the other day.
So college kids and people have been pandered to

So black have been pandered to.
Homosexuals been pandered to.
Illegals have been pandered to.
Druggies have been pandered to.


17 posted on 04/13/2015 12:03:49 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

In Utah polygamy was originally permitted. State was not allowed to enter in the union until that practice was outlawed. I’m not sure about brothers and sisters in KY...


18 posted on 04/13/2015 12:03:54 PM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

Dear Rand: we passed laws democratically. Militant gays and leftists went to judges to overturn valid law. Is that fairness?


19 posted on 04/13/2015 12:03:58 PM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Smoke some dope in public where I have to inhale and get high on that crap or even a small child at a bus stop.

Paulbots will always use the slogan of no Govt and the problem with that is it can be used for anything.

Incest, polygamy, homosexuality and marriage agenda, drugs, age of consent.

Infact the only people he has no pandered to yet is the military where he wants it reduced because even after we have seen no leadership in the world by the fairy in chief Paul wants to carry it on and see the world burn and we come under more attacks.


20 posted on 04/13/2015 12:06:45 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson