Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The clerisy fresh from unconditional victory for gay marriage preparing the battle space for legalization of polygamy.
1 posted on 05/10/2015 7:48:35 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: C19fan

But not for Mormons in Utah. /s


2 posted on 05/10/2015 7:56:11 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Polygamy- another relic of barbarism.


3 posted on 05/10/2015 7:57:19 AM PDT by GenXteacher (You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
a reduction ad absurdum of the marriage equality position.

Today's absurdity is tomorrow's public policy.

4 posted on 05/10/2015 7:59:59 AM PDT by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Only a matter of time until 8 adults and 3 children are all a “couple”


5 posted on 05/10/2015 9:17:25 AM PDT by GeronL (NEW ARRIVALS -> buy here: https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/541331)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

If Marriage is not One Man and One Woman then it is arbitrary and will become defined any collection of adults, children and animals that can be thought of and will be ephemeral and changing.


6 posted on 05/10/2015 10:56:29 AM PDT by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
This says it all about sex and marriage.

Whymnarriage is one man one woman

7 posted on 05/10/2015 11:00:18 AM PDT by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Siunds like the Waltons on TV.


8 posted on 05/10/2015 3:00:42 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

This should be a simple property ownership matter: If all of the people in the house are co-owners of the house then they have a right to live there. The court should simply pass on the question of whether or not they are a family and instead rule on their right of occupancy due to their rights as owners.

The law limiting ownership to a legally defined family is discriminatory. All that should matter to the city is that the house is legally occupied by no more people than are allowed by law.


9 posted on 05/11/2015 9:31:40 AM PDT by MeganC (You can ignore reality, but reality won't ignore you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson