Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cuban leaf

There are many of us who prefer the King James Version. It is a far more beautiful translation.


12 posted on 05/19/2015 10:16:57 AM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Mollypitcher1

It is a far more beautiful translation.


I confess that is the part that really confuses me.

When I first gave my heart to Christ, I would sing songs from our church hymnal and translate thee, thou, etc. to “you, me, etc.” while singing. The reason is simple: I didn’t want to fall into a “false piousness” by using a “special Christian language”. I prefer plain and modern English to ensure I focus on the content of the words and not the words.

In a bible study I’m in, They move around the room to have the students read the scripture. I read through mine plainly and quickly. But others stumble and stutter on their confusing 16th century English as though first year students in a foreign language. The meaning of the words and phrases is lost as people just try to get through the individual words.

But that being said, I understand that opinions vary on this. My father thinks that all versions other than the KJV are from the pit o’ hell. We differ on that.


14 posted on 05/19/2015 10:33:42 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson