Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In the Murky World of Big-Bucks Speeches, the Clintons Are More Transparent Than Most
New York magazine ^ | May 25, 2015 | Ann Lowrey

Posted on 05/26/2015 6:09:05 AM PDT by lbryce

Bill and Hillary Clinton might have left the White House dead broke, but they certainly recovered quickly. The pair has generated tens of millions of dollars of income for themselves and their foundation since 2000, with much of it coming from paid speeches. Indeed, financial disclosure reports recently filed by the Clintons bump the total that they have ginned up in speaking fees to at least $130 million, with the price of a single speech frequently topping $300,000.

Those staggering figures have shined a bright light on the very big, very opaque market for corporate keynotes, addresses to universities, and gab sessions with trade associations. And interviews with the people who buy and sell those speeches — corporate event planners, industry experts, speakers themselves — helps to illuminate it further.

(Excerpt) Read more at nymag.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: deizensofmurk; hillary
Murky? They're like those creatures who live so deep beneath the ocean, they don't need the sun for sustenance. These creatures live near hot water vents that erupt at super-heated temperatures beyond the boiling point. Well, so do the Clintons in their own murky way.
1 posted on 05/26/2015 6:09:05 AM PDT by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JPG; Sarge; Vigilanteman; SERKIT; Talisker; upchuck; Rocky; N. Theknow; hillarynot; laplata

ping


2 posted on 05/26/2015 6:10:36 AM PDT by lbryce (Obama:Misbegotten, Godforsaken Bastard Offspring of Satan And Medusa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
Still, it seems worth noting that we know far less about how much figures like Dubya or Bernanke make, because their earnings do not fall subject to any public disclosure rules.

Bill and Hillary running an enormous slush fund? Selling state secrets to foreign powers? Why, yes, I'd be happy to talk about George W. Bush and his many transgressions ...

These people have no shame.

3 posted on 05/26/2015 6:21:12 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Claire Wolfe should check her watch. It's time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ; sickoflibs; TADSLOS; stephenjohnbanker; Grampa Dave; ken5050; notted; Squantos; Ann Archy; ...
....the Murky World of the Clintons' Big-Bucks Speeches...

Are we sure these "speeches" are legit?

Some execs at companies companies the Foundation listed as giving gargantuan Clinton Honorariums say they never heard of a Cinton giving a speech. And none of the pricey speeches are found on web sites (as is the usual practice).

The just-revealed honorarium payouts include pricey speeches Bill Clinton gave to:

<><> an Irish scholarship fund,

<><> a Korean conglomerate, and,

<><> a Nigerian newspaper company...

..........each of these entities paid Clinton more than half a million dollars........

The Washington Post reported that Hillary Clinton earned $11.7 million by delivering 51 speeches since January, 2014.....she was paid an astonishing $625,000 for two speeches — in one day!

=========================================

AND THIS---Several state and federal agencies the Clintons listed as donors told news outlets they did not contribute to the Clinton Foundation.

<><> EPA is listed as a donor but said there's no record of donations to the Clinton Foundation.

<><> The “Office of Minority Health and Human Services,” is listed but it's not clear what this donation referred to, or even which federal or state office it came from.

<><> The Arkansas Dept of Human Services received a donor "gift receipt" but said they never expended tax dollars to the Foundation.

===================================

Can all the listed donors who took a tax write-off come up w/ a Foundation "gift receipt."

4 posted on 05/26/2015 6:26:46 AM PDT by Liz (Another Clinton administration? Are you nuts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
AND THIS---Several state and federal agencies the Clintons listed as donors told news outlets they did not contribute to the Clinton Foundation.

Hope Rush Limbaugh, Hannity, and FoxNews check it out... this might be the smoking gun...

5 posted on 05/26/2015 7:18:27 AM PDT by GOPJ ("The left hates those who confront evil" - Charlie Daniels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

In the Murky World of Tax Fraud, the Clintons are Less Adept at Hiding it than Most

In the Murky World of Contract Killers, the Clintons are Further Removed from the Hitman than Most

In the Murky World of Sexual Deviancy, the Clintons are More Exposed than Most

In the Murky World of Vote Fraud, the Clintons are More Inept than Most


6 posted on 05/26/2015 10:16:44 AM PDT by generally (Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

The NY Magazine apologizes for them by saying they are slightly less criminal than others. Wow! What a ringing endorsement!


7 posted on 05/26/2015 10:18:22 AM PDT by generally (Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson