Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy Researching Firing Mach 5 Guided Round from Standard Deck Guns
USNI ^ | June 1, 2015 | By Sam LaGrone

Posted on 06/01/2015 6:15:44 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Pontiac

“So how are they going to get the guided munition from Mach 3.5 to 5.0? “

Weight reduction is part of it.


21 posted on 06/01/2015 8:14:46 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jumper

“Sometimes lobbing a shell the size of a Volkswagen Bug at Point du Hoc can make quit an impression.”

Especially at Mach 7?


22 posted on 06/01/2015 9:05:08 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: husky ed
My dad was the gunnery officer for the port 5" battery on USS Iowa during the Korean conflict. His crew wiped out the communist Winter ammo supply at Wonsan Harbor on Sept 22, 1952. Dad was always fond of the big 16 inch guns, but his crew was very precise with the 5". On a "battle efficiency" test, his crew was shooting inert rounds. The commanding officer at the range offered his personal jeep as a target. Big mistake. The 5" round took it out. That almost cost them a loss of the "meatball" flag.
23 posted on 06/01/2015 9:18:51 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac
I believe it would be the same way one would get a faster velocity from their handgun. Either by getting a lighter bullet (eg moving from 147gr to 124 gr, or going even lighter to 115gr ...or some 9mm bullet that is advertising a 2,000 fps but is only 50grs); or by increasing the powder charge (eg going from standard SAAMI pressure to a +P or a +P+).

Or other.

Thus, for the artillery shell, they are either using a smaller round or more powder or both.

24 posted on 06/01/2015 10:08:41 PM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

‘Or other’ = ‘or both.’


25 posted on 06/01/2015 10:09:38 PM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz; TexasGator; Brad from Tennessee
Another possibility is

Rocket assisted artillery

26 posted on 06/01/2015 11:52:31 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Thanks Brad from Tennessee.

27 posted on 06/02/2015 4:31:03 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Vendome

The range?
How about mounted on my SUV? I really dislike those slow drivers in the passing lane on the interstate; clogging traffic. This would be a solution.


28 posted on 06/02/2015 4:35:53 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

Interesting!

http://ww2db.com/image.php?image_id=14967
http://ww2db.com/image.php?image_id=15007
http://ww2db.com/image.php?image_id=15004
http://ww2db.com/image.php?image_id=15005
http://ww2db.com/image.php?image_id=15006
http://ww2db.com/image.php?image_id=14966

http://ww2db.com/photo.php?list=search&sp=&startRow=160&keyword=&source=&color=&foreigntype=S&foreigntype_id=800&dt=&image_id=


29 posted on 06/02/2015 4:38:25 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland

Yeah, they Prius me off too!

Passive aggressive d i c k s


30 posted on 06/02/2015 4:43:39 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
USS Iowa, Korea, 1952

The page cites 23 September 1952 as the date the ammunition dump was destroyed. The back story is that we knew the dump was there, but it was not an "authorized" target. Someone on shore decided to train machine gun fire on the Iowa. My dad noted that it was permissible to return fire when fired upon. He was granted permission. The ammo dump was behind the position firing on the Iowa. It was a spectacular burst of building and bodies going airborne with the ammo dump.

31 posted on 06/02/2015 5:44:01 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
USS Iowa, 23 Sept 1952

Another account was additional detail.

32 posted on 06/02/2015 5:49:09 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson