[rktman]

When adjustments are made to compensate for recently discovered problems ......

u.n.-- is so

u.s.-- is not

u.n.-- is so

u.s.-- is not.........................

How about a steamin' cup of STFU. The erf's gonna do whatever it wants. Oh, wait. Maybe we could make erfquakes a crime. Yeah, that'll stop 'em. Up next: "The joys of cooking over dung fires".

[Bulwinkle]

“Those who control the present, control the past and those who control the past control the future.”

[rockinqsranch]

NOAA is the new abbreviation for BS.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Oh noes. The earth isn’t warming like we say it ought to. Well can we squint our eyes and look crosswise at the temperatures so that we can see that the earth IS warming like we say it ought to?

I checked out WUWT about this issue. Seems that the attempt to adjust actually is bearing strong witness about how unreliable many existing measurements are. And it is accusing satellite readings, that have remained boringly level, of lying.

[backwoods-engineer]

HIDE THE DECLINE!

-- Michael Mann

[Pontiac]

Judith Curry, chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology…I’m sure this latest analysis from NOAA will be regarded as politically useful for the Obama administration, I don’t regard it as a particularly useful contribution to our scientific understanding of what is going on.

Oooo you been burned by a real climate scientist.

Another strange coincidence is that the paper has been published in the midst of President Obama's major push to issue carbon regulations. I'm sure it's just an accident of timing and has nothing to do with the politics of advancing the global warming agenda.

Not strange at all. It’s standard operating procedure.

[Amendment10]

Jethro Bodine and Elly May Clampett used to argue “is to, is not ....” Haven’t been able to find video.

[justa-hairyape]

Government agencies all need to be required by law to report the raw data for any of our sensoring mechanisms. Any modified data must be reported as modified data. The only adjustments done to raw data should be related to malfunctioning sensors or random out of range data points. Mann and the East Anglia folks no longer even have their raw data. It could not be produced when requested. These fools are not scientists. They have no game and no future. They are actually now rebiasing their old biasing of the data. That is the problem with chronic liars. They have to deal with their old lies.

[Gator113]

I am so sick of all the lying that I don’t give a hoot if the entire planet burns up or freezes.

[CA Conservative]

If your go over to WattsUpWithThat, they have some very nice graphs showing how they managed to come up with this BS. To support the initial claim of global warming they went back and adjusted previous readings from 1950 and earlier to colder readings than were actually observed, and adjusted the readings from 1950 forward to readings WARMER than actually observed.

But then came satellite observations, and that lead to the realization that there really has been not warming for the past 17 years or so. So what they did was throw out the satellite readings and just went with land and water based readings. But even that didn't help enough for their purposes, so they adjusted the readings from 1980 to 1999 so that they actually showed a decrease in temperatures during that time - and which of course showed an INCREASE in temperatures from that new lower reading over the past 15 years.

It is interesting reading to see all of manipulations they go through to try to justify their lies...