Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton the inauthentic
Washington Post ^ | June 5, 2015 | By Dana Milbank

Posted on 06/05/2015 3:48:59 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

... There doesn’t have to be smoke to give the appearance of fire at the Clinton Foundation. The sprawling charity has sucked in so much cash from so many sources that, with some creativity, it can be tied to virtually any skulduggery.

Alleged wrongdoing at FIFA? There’s a Clinton tie. International arms dealers? The Kremlin? Uranium production? Human rights violators? Known felons? All can be connected to the Clintons.

At a time when Democrats need to draw contrasts with Republicans by sticking up for the little guy, Clinton’s solicitation of — and favors for — the powerful make her an inauthentic messenger.

As The Post has documented, the Clintons’ charitable efforts have been closely tied to the considerable fortune they amassed for themselves. Bill Clinton was paid at least $26 million in speaking fees by entities that were major donors to the foundation. The foundation has also been good for the balance sheets of Clinton friends such as Sidney Blumenthal, who received about $10,000 a month from the foundation while providing his thoughts on Libya to then-Secretary Clinton.

The Clintons’ defenders will say none of this is illegal, and that may be so. The problem is appearance. Clinton can talk all she wants about income inequality and reducing the influence of money in politics, but her recent experience makes her seem insincere.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; clintonfoundation; hillary; hillaryclinton; monica; pantsuit; perjury; traveloffice

1 posted on 06/05/2015 3:48:59 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

THAT thing has a penis!!! PROOF that our once fine country is DEAD!!!


2 posted on 06/05/2015 3:54:06 PM PDT by Ann Archy (ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I read somewhere that that photo is of a guy. Will wonders never cease? However he kind of fits with the false face the Clintons project.


3 posted on 06/05/2015 3:56:35 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
THIS JUST IN---Bill Clinton appeared at least nine times since 2011 for a speakers’ series for banker UBS’ American clients reaping a tidy $1.5 million, according to financial disclosure statements filed by Hillary.

Bankrolling the Clintons / GRAPH CREDIT: media.mcclatchydc.com

4 posted on 06/05/2015 3:59:40 PM PDT by Liz (Another Clinton administration? Are you nuts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Sen. Cruz should take the wind from Liz Warren’s sails by taking the crony capitalist issue from her. His first target should be the low-hanging fruit: Hillary Clinton.


5 posted on 06/05/2015 4:04:56 PM PDT by Praxeologue ( ')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
At first glance, the Clinton’s lucrative speeches and astounding global foundation donations seem to provide the bulk of the couple’s income. Bill's honoraria increased dramatically---earning some $50 million during Hillary's four-year term as secretary of State....including an Irish scholarship fund, a Korean conglomerate, and, a Nigerian newspaper company......each of whom paid Clinton more than half a million dollars for a single speech.

The Wash/Post reports Hillary earned $11.7 million for 51 speeches since Jan 2014.....she pocketed an astonishing $625,000 for two speeches in one day!

==================================================

But the calculated Clintons have also sought to branch out into other business activities......though little is known about the exact nature and financial worth of Bill Clinton’s non-speech business interests.

Recent reports indicate the Clintons were party to multi-billion dollar Mideast arms deals....Kazakhstan uranium mines....and Haitian gold mines...oil pipelines...and other lucrative business interests which they cunningly intertwine w/ their Foundation do-good activities.

Clinton made a big show of do-goodism in earthquake-ravaged Haiti. And Secy Hillary supposedly gave $billions of tax dollars to Haiti.

Bill and Canadian mining tycoon Frank Giustra in Haiti June 2014. That day, the "Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership" launched the Acceso Peanut Enterprise Corp. (Hector Retamal/AFP/Getty Images)

But Haitian-American protesters outside the Clinton Foundation claim that American aid to Haiti was a cover-for foreign governments to funnel kickbacks of hundreds of millions of dollars to The Clinton Foundation.

For example, gold expert Giustra "gave" the Foundation $100 million....after Bill helped him make billions off uranium deals. Hillary's brother mysteriously got a gold mining license in Haiti.

Donating $100 million, and more, Canadian mining magnate Frank Giustra is apparently one of the Clinton Foundation’largest donors. Giustra's contributions go directly (1) to the tax-exempt Clinton Foundation, and, (2) to the Canada-based "Clinton-Giustra Enterprise Partnership," which in turn sends money to the Clinton Foundation......(according to Canadian tax records researched by "Clinton Cash" author Schweizer).

DATA Sources: Clinton Foundation, CGEP (Canada);
Canadian tax records; compiled by Alberto Cuadra and
Rosalind Helderman May 3 at 8:11 PM

ARTICLE LINK http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/wealthy-canadian-helps-fund-the-clinton-foundation/2015/05/03/f855ea22-f1ea-11e4-90bc-afe06f530791_graphic.html

6 posted on 06/05/2015 4:05:40 PM PDT by Liz (Another Clinton administration? Are you nuts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All
THIS JUST IN: Breitbart News---The Clinton Foundation's undisclosed Swedish entity is hiding the names of secret foreign donors who contributed $5.4 million in 2011 and 2012 to the William J. Clinton Foundation…....in violation of Hillary's federal agreement

=================================================

It's next to impossible to believe Obama knows nothing about the Clintons' buck-raking activities.

Remember she dropped out of the primary so he could forge ahead. A deal was made...undisclosed to the electorate.

Looks to me like they divided up the US govt. She got the State Dept.

Hillary ran it like a shadow govt. Bill trotted the globe acting like a "good will" ambassador.....he devised hundreds of obscure programs to collect billions.....supposedly dispersed to "aid" endless "do-good" projects.

Obama's protecting the Clintons---they're his meal ticket.

All of them are living happily ever after--getting rich on "tolerance and compassion."

Obama gets a cut of every deal the Clintons make.

=====================================================

All of these people have vast hidden holdings:

(1) The missing State Dept $6 billion, (2) the cut of Hillary's brother's Haitian gold mine permit, (3) the gold Obama and Hillary got from invading Quadaffi; (4) the Russian uranium deal income.

And money secreted in (1) numbered offshore bank accounts,(2) investment holdings, (3) safety deposit boxes holding coins, gold, valuables, etc, (4) other holdings in real estate, businesses, (5) passive non-taxable income from rentals, interest accrued, investments, etc .....

7 posted on 06/05/2015 4:08:23 PM PDT by Liz (Another Clinton administration? Are you nuts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Too corrupt to fail.


8 posted on 06/05/2015 4:11:06 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: "I should like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Open questions to the FR Legal experts:

1) If the Clinton Foundation were viewed as a corporation and not a charity, have they not violated Sarbannes-Oxley?

2) Is prosecution under S-Ox limited only to corporations and the employees of such corporations?

3) If the answer to 2 is "no" who has legal authority to take the case to a Grand Jury or to file charges? Does it have to be the Dept. of Just Us?

9 posted on 06/05/2015 4:21:37 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (If Hillary was running against Satan, I'd probably abstain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.; All

Very good questions in a very good thread.


10 posted on 06/05/2015 4:25:55 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I am soooo sick of Hillary Clinton and her husband. And we are still a year and a half away from the election. It’s depressing.


11 posted on 06/05/2015 4:26:24 PM PDT by Rocky (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“but her recent experience makes her seem insincere.”

No way! /s


12 posted on 06/05/2015 4:37:51 PM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Did the Clinton outfit
ever keep money in
offshore banks accounts?


13 posted on 06/05/2015 5:13:56 PM PDT by RockyTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson