Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

190 Republicans who voted to ignore 2/3 vote requirement for trade treaty (TPP)
6-18-15 | johnwk

Posted on 06/18/2015 4:02:50 PM PDT by JOHN W K

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last
To: Diogenesis
I once thought Paul Ryan would make a great President.

Well, I think I'll just stick with someone who doesn't pretend to be something that he isn't.
21 posted on 06/18/2015 4:20:14 PM PDT by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JOHN W K

What about the 6 GOP gutless reps who were too coward to vote.

They are more gutless than the ones who voted yes.


22 posted on 06/18/2015 4:21:16 PM PDT by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JOHN W K

The only Constitutionally enumerated power that a Pres has with other countries concerning ‘agreement’s is a Treaty.


23 posted on 06/18/2015 4:21:36 PM PDT by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Congressman Chris Smith from NJ voted no.
I can't thank him enough.
24 posted on 06/18/2015 4:21:48 PM PDT by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
Everyone needs to just calm the heck down about all this

Every single time they rob, loot and screw Americans while kicking America down a few more notches, that's exactly what we're told...

I've had enough.

25 posted on 06/18/2015 4:21:58 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JOHN W K

Article 1 section 8 says Congress is empowered to regulate national and international trade. Congress carries this out through its normal legislative processes, not the special process for treaties. Congress first started these “fast track” trade agreements back in the 1970s but I think the precedent for handling trade agreements through the normal processes goes back quite a bit further than that.


26 posted on 06/18/2015 4:22:33 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JOHN W K

It wasn’t a 2/3 requirement, because it’s not a treaty. It was a 60 vote requirement to close debate, and the ability to add amendments.


27 posted on 06/18/2015 4:24:10 PM PDT by Hugin ("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!",)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Funny you sent that to yourself.............


28 posted on 06/18/2015 4:24:35 PM PDT by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JOHN W K
It aint no treaty


29 posted on 06/18/2015 4:24:54 PM PDT by capydick ("If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on Earth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Everyone needs to just calm the heck down about all this. You are being spun by Trumps minions.


If TPP is no biggie why is it being kept Top Secret? Bush made public his trade agreements before asking for a TPA.

So the recent precedent is to release the text before a TPA. That’s not happening here. Why is that? That’s certainly a condition Congress could have requested before a vote on TPA and they are not. Why is that?


30 posted on 06/18/2015 4:25:29 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
it’s not a treaty.

Don't confuse them with facts, they have a good Rant going.
31 posted on 06/18/2015 4:26:30 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: novemberslady

I once thought Paul Ryan would make a great President.


So did I. And I also once thought the same about Rubio and Cruz. But it’s clear now that none of them have any interest in defending Main Street from corportist and marxist assaults. Conservatives will never win this war if our generals go AWOL on the battlefield.


32 posted on 06/18/2015 4:29:02 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JOHN W K

“”BILL TITLE: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow Federal law enforcement officers, firefighters, and air traffic controllers to make penalty-free withdrawals from governmental plans after age 50, and for other purposes””

Just when we think we might have had a little clarification on this whole mess, you link us to what? An amendment to the Internal Revenue Code - penalty free withdrawals from government pension plans?


33 posted on 06/18/2015 4:30:06 PM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Everyone needs to just calm the heck down about all this. You are being spun by Trumps minions.
++++
At last, a little sanity. But note that this isn’t just Trump. The RandBots are also very active. Their goal: Kill Cruz Candidacy.


34 posted on 06/18/2015 4:30:41 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

It is a treaty, obamacare is not about health care, and Jenner is still a man.


35 posted on 06/18/2015 4:31:32 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

“There must be big forces at work here causing these conservatives to go right along with a treaty that will be detrimental to United State sovereignty. “

Yes, the US Chamber of Commerce (er Communists).


36 posted on 06/18/2015 4:31:49 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: novemberslady

“I once thought Paul Ryan would make a great President.

Ditto for Ted Cruz. He’s dead to me now.


37 posted on 06/18/2015 4:32:47 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mr. N. Wolfe

Redefine anything like the left is doing and everything is anything.


38 posted on 06/18/2015 4:33:47 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

The Supreme Court has made a lot of unconstitutional rulings but that doesn’t make the rulings correct.


39 posted on 06/18/2015 4:38:06 PM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Lex rex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

It’s all choreographed and manipulated. They know who’s voting on what.

These are professional government bureaucrats.

Insider back door deals. The only reason a few vote against or for something is they know damn well what the vote numbers are going to be. This way ya can’t blame the entire party....They say it was only a few bad apples...Oh shucks, we came so close to winning....You know, it was the RINO’s and GOPe...and on and on. Day in day out.

The Republicans are so corrupt, they gave themselves different names for crips sakes.

Do the corrupt Democrats do this too?


40 posted on 06/18/2015 4:38:11 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson