Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/26/2015 11:36:07 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Brad from Tennessee

Anyone up for finding the “it’s for the chillun” clause in the Constitution?


2 posted on 06/26/2015 11:38:36 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Can we find another one that can unravel it?


3 posted on 06/26/2015 11:43:56 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee
Legal Challenges Remain for Health Law, but John Roberts will make them disappear.
4 posted on 06/26/2015 11:44:43 PM PDT by TChad (The Hillary for America campaign is now auditioning interns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

John A Boner is an awfully leaky vessel to put much faith in.....


5 posted on 06/27/2015 12:27:50 AM PDT by JParris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Many a time I have read on FR that Odunga care SHOULD be ruled unconstitutional due to it originating in the Senate which cannot write tax laws. Anyone know what became of that?


7 posted on 06/27/2015 2:00:25 AM PDT by DAC21 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

“The suit filed by Mr. Boehner, in the name of the House of Representatives, is not just a bookkeeping dispute. It involves fundamental questions of executive power and Congress’s power of the purse.”

So Boehner is going to set it up so that the supreme court can
rule that it’s unconstitutional not to fund Obamacare.
Boehners a liberal. everything he does is for the good of the state
and against the will of the people.


8 posted on 06/27/2015 3:36:18 AM PDT by Slambat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee
I keep saying it. If the 'pubs had wanted to get rid of Obamacare, they would've passed bills to abolish the mandate and abolish any new taxes included in Obamacare. Who could vote against that and still get re-elected? "If you want your Obamacare you can keep your Obamacare" and all that.

It would've starved the beast and simplified the rhetoric. Depending on someone else (ie: the courts) was either dumb or a stall because they want to keep Obamacare. They already knew this court is undependable at best, perhaps treasonous and complicit in the destruction of the US.

The only conclusion I can arrive at is anyone who plays nice with the Republican leadership does not deserve our vote. I'd rather have a small minority with a strong, compelling message. With what we have now, majorities have been the worst thing that happened to our issues.

Think about it. Our only salvation is only for parts of the nation and only if the federal government falls apart. That's what getting rid of the Confederate flag is really all about. It's getting rid of any cultural memory of a defense of states' rights against an out-of-control federal government.

9 posted on 06/27/2015 4:11:53 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Kabuki theater CONgre$$ v. POSOTUS/United Socialist Supreme Court TOTALITARIANCARE? Check$ and Balance$ right?

—That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Go ahead CONgre$$. DEFUND. Show us what you’ve got. After all, YOU DID BUILD THIS…

http://www.usdebtclock.org


10 posted on 06/27/2015 4:54:33 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

The only way to change this law is to come up with a new one that works. It could and should look dramatically different than this one, but being able to shop an alternative is key to getting beyond this one.


12 posted on 06/27/2015 5:18:12 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Sorry Johnny, you can’t win this one in court. You funded the expenditures in the cromnibus because you are too much a coward to fight using your authority. The court will tell you that you can simply fund operations daily, weekly or monthly, each time withholding funds for any specific purpose. But you too afraid of the punishment this president will inflict on Americans and heap the blame for it onto you. And you will not fight back.


16 posted on 06/27/2015 6:23:48 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

The Congress can impeach a supreme court member for lack of “good behavior”. Why haven’t they???

If Congress believes the court is acting politically, they can impeach those members that are.

Why haven’t they??


18 posted on 06/27/2015 8:29:11 AM PDT by CodeToad (Islam should be outlawed and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson