Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Sweetcakes' owner defiant in face of $135,000 fine
Washington Examiner ^ | 7-3-2015 | Barbara Boland

Posted on 07/05/2015 5:50:00 AM PDT by sheikdetailfeather

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-156 next last
To: sheikdetailfeather; goodnesswins; PROCON; Twotone; VeryFRank; Clinging Bitterly; Rio; aimhigh; ...

If you would like more information about what's happening in Oregon, please FReepmail me.

I lost my Oregon list when my computer crashed last year, so please send me your name by FReepmail if you want to be on this list

101 posted on 07/05/2015 9:26:11 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

Yeah, someone might get hurt trying to keep me from leaving that place.


102 posted on 07/05/2015 9:26:18 AM PDT by Delta 21 (Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

Any way that we could all order something from Sweet Cakes?

Or how about a “help” fund for them?


103 posted on 07/05/2015 9:27:19 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RikaStrom
https://www.continuetogive.com/helpsweetcakesbymelissa

90% funded (goal=$150,000). Every freedom loving citizen should donate a few dollars to this family and show that communist shit-smear Brad Avakian this family has wide support.
104 posted on 07/05/2015 9:38:03 AM PDT by farming pharmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

Comment #105 Removed by Moderator

To: BykrBayb

I didn’t say THEY were ignorant. They said in the video they didn’t know the law .... that is called “ignorance of the law”. Otherwise I agree with you.


106 posted on 07/05/2015 10:31:52 AM PDT by Texas Yellow Rose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

wth is some labor commissioner to tell them HOW they have to pay a debt???

unbelieveable


107 posted on 07/05/2015 10:35:34 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jughandle

Seems to me they should have a yard sale, even an online yard sale

Sell their children’s toys and books and such to pay off the lesbians

I would bet with proper publicity they could make $135,000


108 posted on 07/05/2015 10:40:30 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Shows his financial problems and basically what a jerk he is.


109 posted on 07/05/2015 10:50:09 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: erlayman

You are 100% correct, but it seems some commenters refuse to recognize the fact that it is (unfortunately) a law in the state of Oregon, however stupid the law may be, and if they acted against the law they broke it. That is step one.

Step two is doing something against that stupid law.


110 posted on 07/05/2015 10:51:11 AM PDT by Moltke (The tagline that was here previously has suddenly disappeared)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Thanks for sharing a picture of the neo-Marxist tyrant.

I think he did this to try and set a precedent. I doubt this will stand in court if the couple finds competent lawyers. This Marxist clearly exceeded his statutory authority. He cannot impose gag orders or have them arrested. He also cannot issue punitive fines or dictate how they will be paid. Only a court of law can impose these. He can only issue standard civil fines and suspend or revoke a business license.

Not only is their 8th amendment rights being violated by this tyrant, but also their 1st amendment rights to Freedom of religion and free speech. All this couple needs is competent legal representation and a fair, constitution respecting judge. They would also be better pursuing this as a civil rights case in Federal, not state court.


111 posted on 07/05/2015 11:02:55 AM PDT by dsm69 (Boycott News Media/Hollywood Advertisers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Hugh the Scot
I have no problem with any merchant voluntarily posting such notice. A law requiring it is a bridge too far, and one more tyranny of the thin-skinned.

I agree that the chances of it being allowed is zilch. Which is a shame because had the bakery been allowed to post such a sign then all this could have been avoided.

112 posted on 07/05/2015 11:34:08 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: lakecumberlandvet
Short answer - NO!

Leaving aside for a moment that the law would never allow it, why not?

113 posted on 07/05/2015 11:34:51 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
Shows his financial problems and basically what a jerk he is.

Perhaps he's hoping to capitalize on his notoriety in this matter to recharge his political career?

114 posted on 07/05/2015 11:36:10 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather; All
This whole sorry saga was a set-up to target this couple and their business and, of course, all real Christians and anyone else who dares oppose the march of homo-ism. A similar or copy-cat stunt is now being played out in Northern Ireland:
BBC News - 'Gay cake' row: Judge rules against Ashers bakery
115 posted on 07/05/2015 11:49:56 AM PDT by Mr Radical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

I think so or he really loves lesbians.


116 posted on 07/05/2015 12:16:52 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather
Oregon Labor Commissioner Brad Avakian's order requires the couple to use "personal property" rather than only business assets to pay the vast sum

If they are incorporated ...isn't that "order" illegal?

117 posted on 07/05/2015 12:21:36 PM PDT by EBH (And the angel poured out his cup...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

I definitely would think so as this had to do with a business.


118 posted on 07/05/2015 12:34:45 PM PDT by sheikdetailfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

There is a link at post 104 in which you can donate.


119 posted on 07/05/2015 12:36:16 PM PDT by sheikdetailfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

Mr. Avakian should immediately be sued, personally, for deliberate infringement of the owner’s Constitutional right to free speech.

A check for $135,000, paid from Mr. Avakian’s personal assets, should be enough to settle the whole thing.


120 posted on 07/05/2015 12:36:54 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("No social transformation without representation." - Justice Antonin Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-156 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson