Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz: ‘It makes me sad’ to call for Supreme Court retention elections
The Washington Times ^ | Thursday, July 9, 2015 | David Sherfinski

Posted on 07/09/2015 10:52:14 AM PDT by Isara

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: skeeter

I just wonder if any conservative would win.....I can’t imagine a majority would reelect Thomas or Alito......then again Ginsburg would have been gone 5 years ago. I think it depends on when the elections are whether we would do well or not. I think off Presidential Elections, we would do great, but during Presidential elections, we’d end up with some liberal judges on the Supreme Court. It would be interesting to see the make up of the court if we started this 10 years ago.


21 posted on 07/09/2015 11:29:33 AM PDT by napscoordinator (Walker for President 2016. The only candidate with actual real RESULTS!!!!! The rest...talkers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bjcoop

Reading the last few SCOTUS decisions it’s cleat the intent of the judiciary is already dead anyway.


22 posted on 07/09/2015 11:42:45 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Isara

Get back to me when they get around to impeaching and removing the lawless usurpers on the court.


23 posted on 07/09/2015 11:46:00 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Polling: The dark art of .turning a liberal agenda into political reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

We all know the legally correct decisions are the ones we agree with.


24 posted on 07/09/2015 11:53:55 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bjcoop

Better to simply limit members SCOTUS to a single six year term.


25 posted on 07/09/2015 11:55:25 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

A six year term sounds reasonable.


26 posted on 07/09/2015 11:59:34 AM PDT by conservativejoy (We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Isara

Ted Cruz smackdown...


27 posted on 07/09/2015 12:00:42 PM PDT by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Isara

I understand that the court has become very politicized.

But putting a Supreme Court Justice for general election seems wrong to me.

I think we need to elect a President with values, and light a fire under the Senate to confirm decent justices.


28 posted on 07/09/2015 12:11:32 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Yeah, but if they know there is a deadline, they might become even more dangerous:

“...woe to the earth and the sea, because the devil has gone down to you! He is filled with fury, because he knows that his time is short.” Rev. 12:12


29 posted on 07/09/2015 12:34:26 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
Conservative, liberal - hell I'd settle for any justice who took their job seriously.

Its like hiring a plumber and expecting him to fix your faucet, not tune your car.

30 posted on 07/09/2015 12:44:18 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bjcoop
It’s very dangerous to have judicial elections-—threatens the intent of the judiciary. yet some people around here love it

The intent of the judiciary was to make stuff up and then come up with convoluted ways to justify it so we would all be forced to live with it and having no realistic means of checking them or limiting their power? Huh, learn something new every day.

31 posted on 07/09/2015 12:45:10 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
I just wonder if any conservative would win.....I can’t imagine a majority would reelect Thomas or Alito......

Well, there are some alternatives. Have each justice assigned to a slot on the court which gets has to get reconfirmed every 9 years so only one per year is ever on the hot seat. Would they possibly be booted by a partisan congress so they could get their own in? Maybe so. But at least they would all have to defend themselves and their rulings in public and suffer the consequences if they could not. And by limiting it to one per year, it would take years to change the complexion of the court overall. In the meantime, elections of congress could hold them accountable if they start trying to pack the court by removing justices for frivolous reasons.

That's called checks and balances, which we now lack.

32 posted on 07/09/2015 12:52:27 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson