Yes. New ideas deeply rooted in ideologies of envy, sloth, and entitlement. The problem is there is a large sector who contribute nothing at all, taking everything they get from Government (who stole it from working taxpayers).
Now, she advocates a reallocation of wealth as “profit sharing”. Just another fancy way of government stealing from one (or an entity) to give to another.
The end result is that absolutely no good comes from wealth received from value not added.
Hillary, given that you and Bill made over $23 million in a few years from speaking fees, based on your connection to government positions the American people voted you into and paid you for, why don’t you start us out by sharing those profits?
Good point. Just say the magic phrase “profit sharing” and income disparity is reduced to next to nothing. The only problem is, everyone’s annual income is about the same, $7,500. Profit sharing = practically no disparity.Karl Marx would have no problem with near zero income disparity but what would trouble him is the pseudo-economic factor of “profit sharing”.