Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where Do They Fall? The 3 Categories of 2016 Candidates
Conservative Review ^ | July 20, 2015 | Steve Deace

Posted on 07/22/2015 10:07:52 AM PDT by Zakeet

It’s a strong field in terms of resume and talent. Perhaps the strongest the Republican Party has ever had. This only makes it harder for conservatives to discern who’s who and whom to support, especially coming off several cycles where the pickings were slim if you were a movement conservative.

Hopefully we’re about to change that.

Between our in-depth presidential profiles here at Conservative Review, as well as the unique behind-the-scenes access to the process that living in Iowa provides me, the candidates are clearly falling into one of three categories regarding message and how they would govern if elected to the White House:

(Excerpt) Read more at conservativereview.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016election; conservatism; election2016; gop; tedcruz; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Quick summary of their list:

  1. Change Agents (Conservatives): Carson, Cruz, Huckabee, Jindal, Santorum, Paul and Trump

  2. Reformers (Business more or less as usual): Fiorina, Perry, Rubio, Walker

  3. Progressives (Rino's): Jeb, Christie, Graham, Kasich

Bottom Line: Cruz or lose!

1 posted on 07/22/2015 10:07:52 AM PDT by Zakeet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

You need a 4th catagory: Bomb throwers — Trump and Paul


2 posted on 07/22/2015 10:11:21 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Suckabee is no change agent and no conservative. Aside from solidly pro-life views, he is with the GOPe on everything else.


3 posted on 07/22/2015 10:14:18 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

And Walker surely belongs with the Conservative change agents.

1) Rolled back union influence statewide

2) Right to work

3) Protected “pain capable” pre-borns

4) Balanced budget

5) Reduced taxes

6) Instituted concealed carry

7) Armed the National Guard

8) Voter photo ID

9) Outlawed teacher union monopoly on insurance

And that’s just the tip of the iceburg.


4 posted on 07/22/2015 10:17:15 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

There was no business as usual with Walker as governor in Wisconsin.


5 posted on 07/22/2015 10:18:06 AM PDT by DLfromthedesert (www.ouramericanrevival.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Interesting but there are only two distinct groups.
Both of the 2 second groups should be combined and labeled “media patsies”.

We’ll either have the President the media want- again, or one we want. What’s best for the media: high government spending and debt and ‘identity politics’, is not what’s best for the country.


6 posted on 07/22/2015 10:19:16 AM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

Walker belongs in the first group. He accomplished a lot of conservative reforms in Wisconsin.


7 posted on 07/22/2015 10:21:44 AM PDT by DLfromthedesert (www.ouramericanrevival.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet; All
"Change Agents (Conservatives): Carson, Cruz, Huckabee, Jindal, Santorum, Paul and Trump"

Conservative does not necessarily mean respect for the Constitution, particularly the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers and associated limited power to lay taxes.

8 posted on 07/22/2015 10:21:51 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Let’s remember, folks, the President is there to represent the executive branch. Laws will still be passed by Congress. The public gets so wrapped around the axle with the presidential elections that they forget how our system works. Or doesn’t work, I guess.


9 posted on 07/22/2015 10:22:08 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Walker passed and signed drug testing welfare recipients!


10 posted on 07/22/2015 10:25:08 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Scott Walker - a more conservative governor than Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Compare Walker’s record as governor with Huckabee and Jindal and you will see the LIE in this entire article.


11 posted on 07/22/2015 10:26:15 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Scott Walker - a more conservative governor than Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DLfromthedesert

Walker is the most accomplished conservative in the race.
But he’s running a ‘media patsy’ campaign.
I think the RINOs are negotiating with him as the most conservative candidate they can live with- which is a good thing! They’ve never compromised with us before.
But he’s going along with them too much- as far as campaigning goes.
Hope he returns to his strengths, it’s still early.


12 posted on 07/22/2015 10:28:10 AM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Three categories, sure, but his names for them don't work. As labels, "change agents" "reformers" and "progressives" aren't that different -- they all relate to change of one sort or another. I get that he's thinking that some of the candidates represent real conservative change and others simply go with the flow in the direction that liberals are taking the country, but still somebody could come up with better labels.

For one thing Huckabee or Jindal or Santorum is a "change agent" in a different sense that Cruz is, and Cruz is a different sort of "change agent" than Paul. Perhaps Walker may turn out to be more conservative on some economic issues than "visionary" social conservative "change agents" than Huckabee or Santorum or Jindal.

What's become the standard division of Republican candidates over the past few cycles -- social conservatives, economic conservatives, moderate conservatives, and moderates (or something of that sort) -- works better than Deacey's categories, IMHO. Plus he ought to consider changing his own name. When I read the article, I thought it was by Fox News's morning guy.

13 posted on 07/22/2015 10:28:44 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Huckabee, Paul, and Trump are not conservatives, not even close.


14 posted on 07/22/2015 10:43:30 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
"We are seeing a great awakening.
A national movement of We the People, brought together by what unites us -
a shared love of liberty, and an understanding of
the unlimited potential of free men and free women."

Ted Cruz




15 posted on 07/22/2015 10:45:54 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Ted Cruz tells Alabama Republicans he’s the only ‘consistent conservative’ in 2016
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3315221/posts


16 posted on 07/22/2015 10:50:59 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rarestia

“Let’s remember, folks, the President is there to represent the executive branch. Laws will still be passed by Congress. The public gets so wrapped around the axle with the presidential elections that they forget how our system works. Or doesn’t work, I guess.”

Your last sentence gives it all up. The system absolutely does NOT work as it is supposed to! What we have now are executive edicts from the white house and laws made up out of whole cloth by the pathetic supreme court. Congress is mostly a rubber stamp. The branch which was supposed to have almost all the real power now has next to none. Congress should have impeached Obama and several members of the court if it were serving its intended purpose. As things stand now we could replace congress with a computer.


17 posted on 07/22/2015 10:54:04 AM PDT by RipSawyer (Racism is racism, regardless of the race of the racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
The 3 Categories of 2016 Candidates

For the most part, I think the categories are:

Tweedle Dumb

Tweedle Dumber

Tweedle Dumbest

18 posted on 07/22/2015 10:57:20 AM PDT by WayneS (Yeah, it's probably sarcasm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
WHO told Graham and Kasich that it would be a good idea for them to enter the race? It's certainly not like there was a national groundswell for them to become candidates. Who is funding them?

Maybe this is crazy conspiracy theory, but I can't help but believe that someone is orchestrating a lot of this.

19 posted on 07/22/2015 11:17:31 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty ("Deliver us from evil ....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

Doesn’t mean we should continue the descent into chaos. We need a Constitutional Conservative to resurrect the idea of an informed citizenry.


20 posted on 07/22/2015 11:22:05 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson