That is the same New York Times that put Abu Ghraib on the front page nearly 50 times (37 days in a row at one point) and mentioned Bush every time. (Benghazi was on the front page once.) Nobody died at Abu Ghraib.
Posted on 07/26/2015 5:37:18 AM PDT by Zakeet
I saw her on TV this morning and those large bags under her eyes tells me she may have an evening drinking problem.
Times are a-changin’.
Clinton’s supporters are growing older too, and there’s a whole generation that never saw Bill as President, all they’ve seen of Hillary is scandals, lies, and evasiveness, none of those glorious WH years. And now they’re hearing her boring, monotone speeches that lecture them about whatever PC topic is the flavor-of-the-day.
IOW, people are seeing the real Hillary - and are not impressed at all.
A candidate that inherently repels voters is a real problem in politics. Go Bernie!!
Hillary’s first term will be 20 years to life.
You forgot the perverted novelist.
Hillary,
Hang the phone up again and turn on the fax machine.
Atta girl. We knew you could do it.
It’s always entertaining to watch pro-abortion staffers and supporters making the inevitable discovery that their pro-abortion candidate is a nasty, violent, angry, dishonest, narcissistic monster.
I wonder if they’ll do what the Japanese did with The Last Emperor, which is make her think she’s still running, but in reality, she’s no longer in the race.
They can do this by having fake TV appearance after fake TV appearance, and then by telling her that security is such a big concern that she has to give campaign speeches in front of a big TV screen with adoring fans (rather than a live crowd). By the time she realizes that the “live crowds” she keeps giving speeches to in cities around the country are re-runs, the election would be over, and then she can be safely sent to the happy house without embarrassing the rest of the Democrat Party.
It’s no wonder there are 16 GOP candidates...
I think you are quite wrong about that.
One of the most telling facts about what passes for politics in the US today is the consensus that the two inevitable candidates (Bush - Clinton) are the two that nobody wants. I mean, nobody.
The power structure has gotten so weak that only an election between two losers can preserve their power.
Part of the new building has a coffee shop called The Inversion Coffee House. They have a scrim of that picture on one of their windows.
Your pictures don’t include Jim Webb. If the dems have to face Trump, Webb might be the most presidential choice they have.
That is the same New York Times that put Abu Ghraib on the front page nearly 50 times (37 days in a row at one point) and mentioned Bush every time. (Benghazi was on the front page once.) Nobody died at Abu Ghraib.
This really sums it up. Back in 2008, Clinton was telling supporters to send postcards to their friends telling them about her. Postcards.
Also, a lot of young people were during the 1990s and they're going to do a lot of Googling before they decide to support Hillary. They're going to read all the crap that happened then.
Unfortunately, there are lots of intelligent, well-qualified communists whom the Democrats could nominate and who could be elected more or less easily.
Hillary is a sideshow - the longer it goes on before the inevitable collapse or arrest, the better.
Music! Sheer music!
She as had several incidents reminiscent of similar transient ischemic attacks suffered by my mother.
Media will fall into lockstep...
Why don’t the democrats run Putin or Kim Jong Un considering natural born citizen no longer means anything.
It’s no collapse. It’s the greatest comeback of any politician in 200 years.
Bank on it.
Her description reminds me of “She who must not be named.” Lashing out at the people who tell her bad news. That’s what Voldemort did.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.