Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate to vote Monday on defunding Planned Parenthood, first step in renewed battle
FoxNews.com ^ | 8/3/15 | Fox News

Posted on 08/03/2015 9:41:39 AM PDT by blueyon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: blueyon
Time to defund the economy crushing EPA as well
21 posted on 08/03/2015 11:04:20 AM PDT by PATRIOT1876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
They are fighting the wrong battle in defunding Planned Parenthood. Roe v. Wade decision legalized abortions, but it does NOT require taxpayer money to be used to PAY for abortions. The proper course of action should be to prevent any public tax money to be used to pay for abortions.

Indiana attempted this in 2011. However, the problem is that IN Planned Parenthood claimed that their accounting methods do NOT distinguish how much funds go toward providing “abortion services” as opposed to “other health services” and they refused to change that accounting. Therefore, when Governor Daniels had an approved bill to sign, it was written to prevent any tax money funding for Planned Parenthood. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/04/29/indiana-gov-daniels-sign-defunding-planned-parenthood/

U.S. District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt denied Planned Parenthood of Indiana's request for a temporary restraining order...The judge's decision allows the cuts to take effect immediately.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/05/11/judge-expected-rule-wednesday-indiana-planned-parenthood-cuts/

However the usual culprits (PP and ACLU) appealed to a higher US District court whose decision blocked defunding PP.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/82756.html

22 posted on 08/03/2015 11:30:28 AM PDT by CitizenBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

There are probably at least 3 to 5 rino’s who will not vote to defund and I doubt there are any democrats, unless the numbers are such that the democrat leadership will permit one or two to vote in the affirmative, (dems will never defy their leadership) this will most likely be defeated by one vote, you can bet it is a done deal.

I sincerely hope I’m wrong...


23 posted on 08/03/2015 11:52:34 AM PDT by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
Fedral law prohibits “...any person to knowingly acquire, receive, or otherwise knowingly transfer any human fetal tissue for valuable consideration...”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=78Z9LUx7VBI#t=75
However, at least one CA company still advertises human fetal tissue with prices on it's website:
http://stemexpress.com/shop/
24 posted on 08/03/2015 1:55:55 PM PDT by CitizenBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitizenBob

Get it right....this isn’t....

PURCHASE OF TISSUE- It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly acquire, receive, or otherwise transfer any human fetal tissue for valuable consideration

what the law ACTUALLY says:

PURCHASE OF TISSUE- It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly acquire, receive, or otherwise transfer any human fetal tissue for valuable consideration “if the transfer affects interstate commerce”.


25 posted on 08/03/2015 2:01:07 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson