Skip to comments.
Breaking: Senate cloture vote to defund Planned Parenthood fails
Twitter ^
| 08/03/2015
| Frank Thorp
Posted on 08/03/2015 3:03:53 PM PDT by GIdget2004
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: GIdget2004
Sure, we can totally coexist as a single nation with people who take joy in baby butchery.
Yup...
2
posted on
08/03/2015 3:05:18 PM PDT
by
Crazieman
(Article V or National Divorce. The only solutions now.)
To: GIdget2004
If we cannot get something like this to pass, God help us.
Literally.
3
posted on
08/03/2015 3:05:38 PM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obama loves America)
To: GIdget2004
Why did McConnell change his vote to no at the end?
4
posted on
08/03/2015 3:05:50 PM PDT
by
skr
(May God confound the enemy)
To: GIdget2004
5
posted on
08/03/2015 3:06:20 PM PDT
by
Ray76
(Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
To: Red in Blue PA
True. But with this, He might be done helping us...and understandably so.
6
posted on
08/03/2015 3:06:50 PM PDT
by
CatherineofAragon
(("This is a Laztatorship. You don't like it, get a day's rations and get out of this office."))
To: GIdget2004
This was exactly as McConnell planned it by rejecting the prior amendment that would have passed, and putting it as a stand alone, subject to filibuster, which he knew would fail.
7
posted on
08/03/2015 3:06:56 PM PDT
by
montag813
(Bring Back Tar and Feathers)
To: Ray76
8
posted on
08/03/2015 3:06:58 PM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
(Falcon 105)
To: GIdget2004
Need to print the names of the 46 baby killers. And hound each and every one of them.
9
posted on
08/03/2015 3:07:32 PM PDT
by
Cowboy Bob
(Isn't it funny that Socialists never want to share their own money?)
To: GIdget2004
Why do they need a bill to defund PP? All they have to do is to make sure no one sneaks funding into any bill and it is defunded.
10
posted on
08/03/2015 3:08:46 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(There's a right to gay marriage in the Constitution but there is no right of an unborn baby to life.)
To: skr
I believe so that he can bring it up at a later time. Reid did this all the time.
11
posted on
08/03/2015 3:09:21 PM PDT
by
hanamizu
To: All
12
posted on
08/03/2015 3:09:38 PM PDT
by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: skr
So that he could bring it back up in the future.
13
posted on
08/03/2015 3:09:39 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(There's a right to gay marriage in the Constitution but there is no right of an unborn baby to life.)
To: GIdget2004
It was a GOP joke anyway. The GOP was never really interested in stopping the genicidal murder, crime against humanity, and treason by Planned Parenthood. The GOP is as treasonous as the Demonicrats; both parties steal oxygen every time they inhale. Both parties can burn in hell.
To: GIdget2004
Obviously.
As I said, the GOP is dead.
Just like those foetuses they abandoned. (foeti?)
If only we could do with the GOP what Planned Babypartshood did to those innocents.
Remember this following CW-II, which is closer in the mirror than ut appears.
15
posted on
08/03/2015 3:09:49 PM PDT
by
Da Coyote
(Di)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Doing it that way provides no theater, it just works. That’s why they won’t do it that way.
16
posted on
08/03/2015 3:09:55 PM PDT
by
datura
To: GIdget2004
Who are the butchers, with the blood of our unborn innocent on their hands? Name and, well you can't shame...just name 😢
17
posted on
08/03/2015 3:10:26 PM PDT
by
Jane Long
("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
To: Red in Blue PA
Why didn't mcconnell, in the spirit of his predecessor Hairy Red, use the nuclear option and pass this with a simple majority vote?
Stopping taxpayer funded support for a baby butchering business should be a no-brainer ... unless of course you're concerned with how to control the negro population if PP goes away ....
18
posted on
08/03/2015 3:10:50 PM PDT
by
glennaro
To: skr
So it can be brought up again. That is the rule. You saw this a lot with Reid. Anyone in that position would do the same thing.
19
posted on
08/03/2015 3:10:56 PM PDT
by
napscoordinator
(Walker for President 2016. The only candidate with actual real RESULTS!!!!! The rest...talkers!)
To: GIdget2004
OK, great theater for now.
What I want to see is the books. Follow the money. Organ selling was an established practice. How big was it? Did it go to general funds, or was it “off the books?” An investigation into this would be dynamite.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson