Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'This Agreement Doesn't Prevent War - It Brings it Closer'
inn ^ | 8/5/15 | Hezki Ezra

Posted on 08/05/2015 1:37:48 PM PDT by Nachum

A top Israeli official has released an official response to US President Barack Obama on Wednesday night, after he attacked Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and his opposition to the deal struck between the West and Iran during a jab-laden speech.

"Israel does not doubt the sincerity of President Obama, but disagrees with his position," the official stated to Arutz Sheva on condition of anonymity. "This agreement does not prevent war, but brings it closer, because it gives international legitimacy to Iran to build the infrastructure to create an arsenal of nuclear bombs, and is financing the terrorist machine and its aggression with hundreds of billions of dollars."

"Iran's economic distress today restricted its development capabilities for destruction, and the removal of sanctions will propel [that development] to the same proportions that would endanger Israel, the region and the world," the official continued. "The agreement does not block the path of the Iranian bomb - on the contrary. It allows Iran to proceed on two tracks for a bomb - both under the agreement and if it breaks it."

"The agreement regarding the Iranian nuclear infrastructure does not meet the require for peaceful purposes, but for a military nuclear program," the official added. "Whoever wants a civilian nuclear program does not need thousands of centrifuges that enrich uranium."

(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...


TOPICS: Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: agreement; iran; israel; lebanon; netanyahu; waronterror
Jerusalem snaps back at Washington, breaking down several of Obama's justifications of the Iran deal after he criticized Netanyahu.
1 posted on 08/05/2015 1:37:48 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


2 posted on 08/05/2015 1:39:11 PM PDT by Nachum (Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This agreement does not stop war, it guarantees it.

It does not stop their nuclear program, it shelters it, promises to defend it, and finances it.


3 posted on 08/05/2015 1:40:05 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Got just one friend... THAT’S THE UNDERTAKER!!


4 posted on 08/05/2015 1:47:46 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
The Undertaker WWE


5 posted on 08/05/2015 1:57:38 PM PDT by Nachum (Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum


ALSO SEE:

State Dept. 'Doesn't Need to See' Covert Iran Side Deals


Spokesman claims side deal with IAEA that US NOT Allowed to See 'Is Nothing Secretive'!
Deals have Iran Inspect Own Nuclear Weapons Sites.


Iran has demanded the side deals be kept secret from the US in a demand the IAEA and Obama administration have willingly complied with, not letting Congressional review be privy to the secret deals. Significantly, they stipulate that Iran will inspect its own covert nuclear sites where nuclear detonator testing has occurred, with international inspectors forbidden from visiting.

Toner was asked by a reporter: "are you confident that you have been briefed on all the most crucial details and that is what you’re telling the American people that you don’t need to see the document because you know everything that is in there?"

When asked if these side deals should be a concern given the unique situation of Iran's repeated calls to destroy Israel and the US, Toner reiterated, "it is very common for these type of agreements to exist. There is nothing secretive about them.”

In a telling self-correction, he added, "we are confident that these are good ag-...that these agreements are fine."

When asked in a Senate hearing last month about the side deals having Iran test its own nuclear sites, most significantly the covert army base Parchin, US Secretary of State John Kerry said he "trusts" the IAEA when it says it is satisfied with the deals.

6 posted on 08/05/2015 2:00:09 PM PDT by onyx (PLEASE Support FR - GO MONTHLY - Join CLUB 300 - God bless FR's Donors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

His Iran agreement guarantees World War III.


7 posted on 08/05/2015 2:06:18 PM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The second coming of Munich.


8 posted on 08/05/2015 2:07:14 PM PDT by GenXteacher (You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

obozo makes a deal with the guys who are yelling death to America and who are ACTUALLY in charge in Iran and then tries to say that they somehow don’t matter and that the Republican are making common cause with them. That obozo survives politically afterward is all you need to see to KNOW that America is done. Only the hellish conflagration to which is leading this nation will snap the stupid back to reality.


9 posted on 08/05/2015 2:31:49 PM PDT by TalBlack (Evil doesn't have a day job...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

State doesn't need to see the deals because they're irrelevant to the objective of achieving an Iranian bomb.

10 posted on 08/06/2015 5:07:50 AM PDT by SJackson (C Matthews: should NY State recognize gay marriage? Sen Clinton: "No!" The crowd booed, 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Democrat in all but name Ron Rand Paul: by contrast, a Democrat who's not running for POTUS:
11 posted on 08/08/2015 11:51:39 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson