Posted on 08/17/2015 4:22:25 AM PDT by Kaslin
resident Obama owns two adorable dogs, Bo and Sunny. Clearly, he likes animals. So, it’s puzzling why his administration supports global environmental policies and federally-subsidized energy technology that endangers animals like cats and birds.
CATS
Sadness and anger echoed around the world when an American dentist shot Cecil the lion, a protected animal, in Zimbabwe. But where is the shock and disappointment over the fact that Australia plans to spend some $6 million to shoot, poison and trap 2 million feral cats? And why has the Obama administration applauded Australia’s plans while making a big show of seeking justice for Cecil?
I support hunting as a wildlife conservation method that treats animals with dignity. However, Australia’s plan does not fall into this category because hunting is not effective for managing feral cat populations. Additionally, our administration is sending the unhealthy message that some cats—namely “celebrity” cats like Cecil—deserve more attention than non-celebrity feral cats that help keep rodent populations in check.
"By 2020, I want to see 2 million feral cats culled, five new islands and 10 new mainland areas as 'safe havens,' free of feral cats, and control measures applied across 10 million hectares," said Australian Environment Minister Greg Hunt upon announcing Australia’s plan.
John Berry, the U.S. ambassador to Australia, was present during Hunt’s announcement. Berry took the time to laud Australia’s “leadership position” on wildlife preservation. Meanwhile, another representative of the Obama administration led a global investigation to protect one particular cat:
“USFWS is investigating the tragic killing of #CecilTheLion. Will go where facts lead. Efforts to contact Dr. Palmer so far unsuccessful,” tweeted U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service director Dan Ashe on July 30.
Many experts believe that the most effective and caring way to manage a feral cat population is through a process of “trap, neuter and return” (TNR). Disneyland in California has successfully employed TNR for over a decade. By managing the cats instead of killing them en-masse, Disneyland has been able to keep mice (the non-Mickey kind!) in check.
TNR is effective for two reasons: cats are very territorial and they also breed very quickly. Indeed, according to North Shore Animal League America, one unneutered male and one unneutered female cat and her offspring can be responsible for the production of 2,000 kittens in the course of four years. If cats are removed from their territory and killed—whether that territory is Brooklyn, New York or Sydney, Australia—new cats will move in and claim this territory and begin breeding.
Obama’s administration wants it both ways. They want to appear concerned about Cecil’s death while pandering to an ally like Australia as it culls 2 million cats.
BIRDS
Obama claims “we may not be able to reverse” the damage of climate change without his EPA’s new “green” rules that force coal-burning power plants to cut greenhouse gases. His rules will force Americans to rely more heavily on wind and solar technology, which kills scores of birds every year.
The world’s largest solar thermal project, Ivanpah, reportedly kills two birds every minute in the California Mojave Desert. Nevada’s Crescent Dunes Solar Project is another bird-killer. “Over a six-hour period, biologists counted 130 ‘streamers,’ or trails of smoke and water left behind as birds ignited and plummeted to their deaths,” reports PopSci. Assuming 100 birds die every 6 hours, just one solar project is capable of killing 146,097 birds every year!
Obama may argue that the process of producing coal power kills more birds than the production of solar or wind power. But when you combine the estimated number of birds killed by wind turbines and solar power—it is about equal to the number allegedly killed by coal production. And that’s before we have built the number of wind and solar projects necessary to meet Obama’s new standards. Soon, wind and solar technology will kill more birds than we now kill by producing coal. If coal is “dirty,” then wind and solar are filthy.
By the way, coal provides 39% of American energy needs at very affordable rates. Politicians craving public approval fail to mention that their beloved green tech is unaffordable for poor Americans. Obama’s new rules do not deserve the classification of “green,” or “clean” because they harm animals and people alike.
I recently saw an article in Salon claiming that Bernie Sanders “out-greens” Hillary Clinton. If you want to know which presidential candidate is the greenest, consider whether their ideas will help or harm the weakest members of our world, such as impoverished human beings, cats and birds. Much of the so-called “green” movement is actually “red” because it causes animals—feathered, furry and human—to die prematurely.
And the EPA kills rivers in America
You got it
Everything the EPA touches turns to garbage.
And nurtured cats don’t kill wildlife.
TNR is just stupid there is no shortage of feral cats.
I agree with the basic argument of the article. Obama’s domestic energy policy is garbage which will cost the average American billions. His hatred of coal is idiotic; his worship of the “spaghetti monster” of “climate change” is superstitious. But what Australia is doing makes sense. Feral cats do untold damage to its native wildlife. The same thing has happened on lots of tropical islands where feral cats have no predators or winter to thin their numbers. Oz had the same problem with rabbits, until it introduced a disease that killed most of them off. Ate everything green in sight. And I’m not saying this as a cat hater.
There is no difference between nurtured cats and feral cats when it comes to killing birds or such except the mind of the nurturer
I hope Trump ends up doing what Perry forgot to say what he was going to do.
Nope, it just reduces the number of cats, TNR.
TNR works.
Yep.
Should take a lesson from that psycho, Mao, who ordered the killing of birds. He claimed they were eating all the grain which threw off hi ag production goals. The next few years saw huge crop devastation from insects.
Also, Europe during the Black Plague. “Hey, cats are evil, they associate with witches, let’s kill them all!” Shortly thereafter, plague carried by the species-specific fleas of the now-unchecked rats killed off 60% of Europe and set human development back *centuries*.
Those around here call the leftist party ‘Rats may be closer to the truth than I had hoped. Could a lobby of four legged rats want a different outcome/
Everything INSANITY touches turns to garbage.
As well as people.
I don’t know...but...in a beach community we go to one of the homeowners decided to do TNR....there are a lot less ferals now...
Feral cats are NOT an indigenous species in Australia, and they cause all kinds of damage to the critters that are.
Eradication of said kittez is the best way to deal with the problems they cause.
I read some time ago that cats and dogs too, were deciminating the kiwi bird population in New Zealand. Those birds are absolutely helpless, they can’t fly or barely can and mainly hover around the ground and they are very rare. It’s a difficult situation.
http://www.bioexpedition.com/kiwi-bird/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.