Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway

Holmes should have gotten the death penalty. He avoided it because of one liberal (I assume) juror who refused to vote for the death penalty. if there ever was someone who,should have gotten it, it was Holmes. He murdered 12 people and injured 70 others.

This guy Dexter, also deserves death. If these idiots protest, they are protesting liberal idiocy, not white racism. They would never see it that way because they’re morons.


8 posted on 08/28/2015 11:38:18 PM PDT by rusty schucklefurd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rusty schucklefurd
He avoided it because of one liberal (I assume) juror who refused to vote for the death penalty

I'm really not aware of the facts on either of the two cases so I don't really have a specific opinion. But your comment above hit home with me in one respect.

If the laws of a state allow a death penalty case to be brought, then the jury selection should screen for the types you mention. My feeling is that a liberal zealot will lie in the screening anyway, but if the case is truly one of death and justice, then I believe potential jurors in these cases should be given a lie detector test.

I realize a LD test isn't a legally admissible exhibit in a court proceeding, but it is not out of the realm of the jury selection/strike process between prosecution and defense. This would just be adding one more party to the process - the law.

13 posted on 08/29/2015 2:25:39 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson