Yes, the Washington Post is working overtime (like you) to do the bumbling Walker mime.
Since there is a limit to what I can except here, I suggest to those who aren’t on this thread solely to campaign for another candidate, that they read the article (again bearing in mind the source).
That’s unfair of you to say that about me. I’ve gone out of my way to be understanding of Walker (who I don’t support) and civil to you (who I’ve always liked). Maybe I should rethink all of that if that’s the way you’re going to be.
You just lied about me. Just to be clear.
That’s one fact I absolutely know.
Is posting this doing the bumpling Walker mime?
LIKELY REP CAUCUS-GOERS.............................................
Wht POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY
Tea BrnAgn CONSERVATIVE Mod/
Tot Party Evang Very Smwht Lib Men Wom
Bush 6% 2% 4% 3% 2% 12% 3% 9%
Carson 21 23 27 26 23 14 20 23
Christie 1 - - - - 3 1 -
Cruz 9 16 12 15 7 1 10 7
Fiorina 5 2 4 4 5 8 5 6
Gilmore - - - - - - - -
Graham 1 - - - 1 1 1 -
Huckabee 4 3 7 7 4 - 3 5
Jindal 2 2 1 2 2 3 2 2
Kasich 5 2 2 2 5 9 6 3
Pataki - - - - - - - -
Paul 4 4 5 3 3 4 4 3
Perry 1 2 1 1 - 3 - 2
Rubio 5 2 6 4 5 8 5 5
Santorum 1 - 2 1 1 1 - 2
Trump 27 31 20 24 34 26 32 22
Walker 3 6 5 4 4 2 4 3
DK/NA 4 6 4 4 3 5 3 7
The number closest to the candidate’s name is that candidate’s total Iowa support.
Trump 27
Walker 3
This is Iowa.
Iowa.
Iowa.
“Since there is a limit to what I can except here.....”
Spelling: EXCERPT