Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US government says it will now use the term 'sexual rights'
AP ^ | 9/18/15 | Cara Anna

Posted on 09/18/2015 11:39:59 AM PDT by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Iron Munro

Don’t know if I can take it much longer...


21 posted on 09/18/2015 11:53:55 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Doublespeak.


22 posted on 09/18/2015 11:53:56 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

[[Sixteen more months of this insanity!

All day, every day, 7 days a week for sixteen months !!!!!]]

I’ve been saying it right along- it’s going to get much much worse as dear leader unleashes unholy hell o nthis country before he leaves office (and the GOP just sits there and allows it to happen)


23 posted on 09/18/2015 11:54:06 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Obama’s favorite way of leading from behind.


24 posted on 09/18/2015 11:54:58 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (The federal government retards me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Mark my words- if the Lord waits, the day will be soon coming in which it will be discriminatory to pass or enforce laws preventing public sex acts.


25 posted on 09/18/2015 11:55:49 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

I’ve been lobbying friends to use the word “Coercive” instead of “Progressive”. It’s an accurate description of today’s Left.


26 posted on 09/18/2015 11:58:23 AM PDT by rightwingcrazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rightwingcrazy

Yeah, that’s good.
Hillary let the cat out of the bag not too long ago.
She said she didn’t believe in changing people’s hearts and minds, but of using policy (ie, coercion) to make things right.


27 posted on 09/18/2015 11:59:42 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

[[”right to have control over and decide freely and responsibly on matters related to their sexuality, including sexual and reproductive health, free of coercion, discrimination, and violence.”]]

Expect a new Amendment anytime soon: “And should have the right to abort their child up to and including 7 years of age if the parents decide the child is too much of a burden for them. And, Unborn Children shall have NO right to protection from violence either”

These sick freaks will very likely, very soon ALSO come up with euthanasia REQUIREMENTS because older people impede o n the ‘rights’ of younger people by placing a ‘burden’ on the younger people’s lifestyles when the younger people have to take care of the older folks

The ONLY violence done is to the unborn child! And NOONE is coercing them to do a damn thing! NOR are we discriminating against ANYONE- the law is the law- Laws against Sexual immorality are NOT discrimination no more so than laws against murder and EVERY other IMMORAL behavior are discrimination!


28 posted on 09/18/2015 12:02:14 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; All
Thank you for referencing that article markomalley. Please bear in mind that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.

"The U.S. government says it will begin using the term "sexual rights" in discussions of human rights and global development."

FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

The only sex-related right that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect, giving Congress the express authority to strengthen such a protection, is voting rights as evidenced by the 19th Amendment. So the corrupt feds are once again addressing a PC “civil right” that they actually have no constitutional authority to address, presumably in the name of winning votes from low-information voters.

And since so-called sexual rights appear to be treaty-related, we cannot repeal the ill-conceived 17th Amendment fast enough imo.

Also, I think that the 17th Amendment repeal amendment should have a provision requiring foreign diplomats who deal with federal government officials to first pass a test which shows that they are knowledgeable of the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers.

29 posted on 09/18/2015 12:03:51 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster

You have the right to an orgasm. Anything you do can be recorded and used in a porn video. You have the right to a sex partner. If you do not have a sex partner the Court will appoint one for you.


30 posted on 09/18/2015 12:05:09 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Sick.


31 posted on 09/18/2015 12:05:38 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Pervert sex will get its rightful justice from above only they will not like the results.


32 posted on 09/18/2015 12:05:46 PM PDT by tflabo (Psalm 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

More and more it looks like the state is sponsoring the religion of sex.


33 posted on 09/18/2015 12:17:08 PM PDT by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheelbarrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

the Founders are rolling in their graves


34 posted on 09/18/2015 12:31:06 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
The statement, posted on a State Department website, says sexual rights include people's “right to have control over and decide freely and responsibly on matters related to their sexuality, including sexual and reproductive health, free of coercion, discrimination, and violence.”

Is rape now a sexual right if you are a Muslim male?

35 posted on 09/18/2015 12:34:04 PM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Objective Scrutator
Sex, sex, sex That’s all the Democrats think about

To be precise, that's all they want us to think about so we don't notice their hands in our pockets. Bread and Circuses, circa 2015.

36 posted on 09/18/2015 12:45:10 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves (Heteropatriarchal Capitalist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

What the hell is sexual rights?
Do you have a “right” to sex with your spouse?
How about a right to sex with a family member? Brother sister uncle, aunt etc.........
Do you have a right to sex with a date you spent money on?
Does our “Government” have a single friggin brain cell?


37 posted on 09/18/2015 1:44:52 PM PDT by 48th SPS Crusader (I am an American. Not a Republican or a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

How about the right to be left alone by the homosexuals?


38 posted on 09/18/2015 1:52:55 PM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

What the hell is sexual rights?
Do you have a “right” to sex with your spouse?
How about a right to sex with a family member? Brother sister uncle, aunt etc.........
Do you have a right to sex with a date you spent money on?
Does our “Government” have a single friggin brain cell?


39 posted on 09/18/2015 1:57:58 PM PDT by 48th SPS Crusader (I am an American. Not a Republican or a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“Sexuals rights” = newspeak for perversion.


40 posted on 09/18/2015 2:00:31 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson