Posted on 10/10/2015 9:42:08 AM PDT by Impala64ssa
The administration at the University of Toronto was recently enlightened on why two separate washrooms are generally established for men and women sharing co-ed residencies.
The University is temporarily changing its policy on gender-neutral bathrooms after two separate incidents of "voyeurism" were reported on campus September 15 and 19. Male students within the University’s Whitney Hall student residence were caught holding their cellphones over female students’ shower stalls and filming them as they showered.
Melinda Scott, dean of students at the University of Toronto, told The Daily Wire that campus police had been contacted immediately and worked with residence staff to “support impacted students and ensure the safety of the Residences.”
“Given the serious nature of these incidents and the impact on directly affected students, we made the decision to specifically designate some washrooms in Whitney Hall for those who identify as men and those who identify as women,” Scott said.
Male students within the University’s Whitney Hall student residence were caught holding their cellphones over female students’ shower stalls and filming them as they showered.
The Daily Wire contacted the University dean and staff members and asked them how they could be unfeeling enough to force men to use men’s washrooms and women to use women’s washrooms.
“What does the University have to say to this?” The Daily Wire demanded. "How could the University be so intolerant?"
The University defended itself, asserting that “more than 50% of the washrooms in the residence remain gender-neutral.”
Of course the University maintained it would not be so intolerant as to limit men and women to designated bathrooms. Instead, it is a “temporary measure” to “provide a safe space for the women who have been directly impacted by the incidents of voyeurism and other students who may feel more comfortable in a single gender washroom in the wake of these events.”
This makes perfect sense: some students are bigots and would prefer to not get naked in the presence of strangers of the opposite sex.
The University concluded that while the changes were made in the specific residence hall of the voyeurism incidents, “there has been no change to the designation of gender-neutral washrooms in the other University College Residences or elsewhere on campus as a result of these incidents.”
Hateful bigots.
Is there anything stupider in the galaxy than a university administrator trying to pretzel into a multiple-politically-correct position?
Brick and mortar universities as are anachronistic as big-media news organizations.
In the name of political correctness, I believe there should be four restrooms — female, male, male to female tranny, and female to male tranny.
It would be wrong of the PC crowd to believe male to female needs to share a restroom with male to female trannys.
If you’re going to make a freak show out of it, I say go all out.
Also, if there is a long line at the other restrooms, can you just hit the gender neutrals? Who’s going to check?
Just turn the administrative offices into open latrines.
Your plan seems too nice for the trannies. They should use port-o-potties like the filthy freaks that they are. If they decide to cut off their genitalia and throw it in the toilet, it would be best that flush toilets don’t get stopped up from an obstruction.
“At least” this was adults. As the hysteria of political correctness advances we are having enforced all “gender” bathrooms in California, which involve CHILDREN i.e. little boys and little girls both made vulnerable to actual attack, indecent exposure, and of course the inevitable pictures and video tapes.
This nation has gone insane.
Liberals, where is your trust in the perverts?
What gender is that thing in the red shirt?
People are sick. Liberals are sicker.
How can we even pretend this point that schools have anything to do with learning?
Good question!
It might be wise not to take a degree from the U of T at face value...question why that school was the choice of the applicant, what were the courses of study and what were the grades. Any course that ends in “Studies” is a red flag and usually a gut, no show course. In other words, a waste of money.
A few people ruin it for the majority. How ironic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.