[Libloather]

The models did not all simulate the same outcomes, but most of them did predict one or more abrupt regional shifts.

I used to build models. Not one of them ever ended up looking like the picture on the box.

[Diogenesis]

The shift will be $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ diverted to the
DNC patent on global warming.

[dp0622]

Me neither :)

Is it going to be like that Pro Algore movie the day after next Thursday, or whatever it was called.

In it, tidal waves hit Manhattan and then freeze instantly.

I wonder if my old Investment Banking employers would give us the next day off?

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Computer models are not science.

[catnipman]

“Climate change could arrive with startling speed.”

Or not.

[Cicero]

Well, what else can you expect from something called “Eco-business”?

[C210N]

..in one of the team’s climate model simulations, the Atlantic circulation system keeps ticking over until about 2020. For another 20 years, sea and air temperatures vary wildly and the ocean current weakens much more swiftly. After about 2040, ice starts to form on the North Atlantic. By 2060, the circulation system has collapsed and the sea ice starts to spread...

Need to be on the look out for human symptoms... first, fevers; then, dryness of throat; followed by dizziness, itchiness and rash; then, severe muscle spasms, drooling... the digestive system collapses, and uncontrollable flatulance... finally, we'll all be reduced to quivering wasted pieces of jelly.

[Vendome]

get back to me when Venice finally become uninhabitable or, for that matter, Holland...

[SteveinSATX]

[Excellence]

Who the hell is “eco-business.com”?

[elpadre]

computer reliability??

Climate computers are the same as those we see as possible tracks for hurricane. There may be as many as 30 models, no two follow the same track. It looks like spaghetti. How do you trust any of them?

[Flick Lives]

Microagression climate change.

[Da Coyote]

Indeed it can.

And should it occur, one can be certain it will NOT be for any of the silly reasons given by the D grade “scientists who have been unable to make one successful prediction evah!

There is a reason these clowns could not earn a living were it not for government grants...by the same fools who have given us the Education Department, the EPA, the IRS, and perhaps even the FBI (we’ll judge that one if they fail to convict the Hillabeast).

[sima_yi]

...warms by an average of 2°C, the proposed “safe limit” for global warming.

A 2 degree C increase would bring the world temperature up to where it was during the Medieval Climate Optimum, which is so called for a very good reason.

[JimSEA]

They are importing tipping points in spite of no evidence for them in the geologic record. Climate change happens all the time but this isn’t well grounded in the record. Polemics.

[smokingfrog]

If you’re losing, move the goalposts.

[Bob434]

for crying out loud- they are just making crap up as they go- Next we’ll hear something along the lines of “If frogs mate on may 21’st instead of May 22’nd, We’ll know climate change is happening” OR “If we only get 41 days of snow instead of 48 days, We’ll know climate change is happening”

They are setting everything up now, so that no matter what happens, whether it gets colder, hotter, less humid, more humid, etc etc etc they wil lget to blame it on climate change

They are already covering the possibility that the world could get colder by declaring there is a ‘blob of coldness’ I the oceans which they claim will ‘drastically alter weather patterns around the globe”, So, if it gets colder, they will still get to say man has caused it by causing this cooling blob to reside I ocean

They simply are NOT going to let go of this LIE because they are so heavily invested in this LIE that they can’t be proven wrong- ever

[Chode]

[TigersEye]

So climate change, driven by global warming as a consequence of rising carbon dioxide levels, ..., could be – for many people – gradual, imperceptible and difficult to identify immediately.

If you're having trouble identifying it why not check the Greenhouse Theory itself?

No smoking hot spot

1. The greenhouse signature is missing. We have been looking and measuring for years, and cannot find it.

Each possible cause of global warming has a different pattern of where in the planet the warming occurs first and the most. The signature of an increased greenhouse effect is a hot spot about 10km up in the atmosphere over the tropics. We have been measuring the atmosphere for decades using radiosondes: weather balloons with thermometers that radio back the temperature as the balloon ascends through the atmosphere. They show no hot spot. Whatsoever.

If there is no hot spot then an increased greenhouse effect is not the cause of global warming. So we know for sure that carbon emissions are not a significant cause of the global warming. If we had found the greenhouse signature then I would be an alarmist again.

No Hot Spot = no Greenhouse warming.
Easy to measure with basic technology.
So simple you'd think even a liberal would get it.

[The_Media_never_lie]

My gosh, we are all going to die!!!!! Someday.

[jospehm20]

When I lived in Nebraska, abrupt climate change happened all the time.