Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gaffer

I haven’t looked through the 57 page decision yet.

http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/7541c52a-9924-4ba1-af2b-59f16bbeb2a5/3/doc/14-36_14-319_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/7541c52a-9924-4ba1-af2b-59f16bbeb2a5/3/hilite/


6 posted on 10/20/2015 2:21:56 AM PDT by Daffynition (*We are not descended from fearful men*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Daffynition

I scanned through it. I didn’t see any mention of actual statistics considered in the decision. Not saying there wasn’t but the decision seems to me to be based solely on the Court’s impression that the ban would decrease crime, not actually has decreased crime since the ban went into effect.

The majority of the decision is this court rationalizing its way out of having to rightly consider Heller vs DC decision as not being applicable.

Lots and lots of definitions about magazines, features tests and the like and what seems to me to be twisted definition of the working of the Second Amendment


11 posted on 10/20/2015 2:36:54 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson