I haven’t looked through the 57 page decision yet.
I scanned through it. I didn’t see any mention of actual statistics considered in the decision. Not saying there wasn’t but the decision seems to me to be based solely on the Court’s impression that the ban would decrease crime, not actually has decreased crime since the ban went into effect.
The majority of the decision is this court rationalizing its way out of having to rightly consider Heller vs DC decision as not being applicable.
Lots and lots of definitions about magazines, features tests and the like and what seems to me to be twisted definition of the working of the Second Amendment