Skip to comments.
People v Jennifer Jorgensen (Breaking: NY Appeals Court rules a six-day-old child is not a person)
New York State Court of Appeals ^
| 10/22/15
| New York State Court of Appeals
Posted on 10/22/2015 7:19:44 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 last
To: Artcore
If a 6 day old baby isn’t a person, then a 60 year old judge shouldn’t be considered a person either.
61
posted on
10/22/2015 12:20:44 PM PDT
by
bgill
( CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
To: LucyT
The judge is a pig!
62
posted on
10/22/2015 2:35:16 PM PDT
by
Brown Deer
(Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
If the six day old child were the sole heir to an estate, would that child be a person for inheritance purposes?
-PJ
63
posted on
10/22/2015 2:40:11 PM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: Noumenon; Artcore; LucyT
What is her charge against Robert and Mary Kelly???
64
posted on
10/23/2015 9:48:10 AM PDT
by
danamco
(-)
To: Noumenon; Artcore; LucyT; Behind Liberal Lines
What is her charge against Robert and Mary Kelly???
65
posted on
10/23/2015 9:49:13 AM PDT
by
danamco
(-)
To: danamco
She was found not guilty on those by the jury and guilty of the charge vis a vis the baby. The appeals court threw out the guilty verdict regarding the baby with this deciison.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson