Posted on 12/01/2015 8:43:01 PM PST by Kaslin
Via the Free Beacon, this would be like Ariel Sharon visiting Manhattan in October 2001 and casually observing that terrorism just doesn’t happen outside Israel.
What he means here, I assume, is that mass shootings don’t happen outside the U.S. with the frequency that they do here. (Either that or he’s categorizing the Planned Parenthood shooting differently from the clear-cut political terrorism that Paris saw a few weeks ago, which, if so, is waaaay off-script from the left’s “pro-lifers are terrorists” narrative this week.) And so we return to the evergreen question whenever he starts talking guns in the aftermath of a shooting: Which Democratic gun-control proposal would have made a material difference in the various mass shootings in America over the past few years? What’s the (ahem) magic bullet of policy that’s going to knock the number down by, say, 10-20 percent? If there’s anything good that might come from Obama focusing on guns in his final year, it’s the fact that, as a lame duck, he might be willing to be more candid in admitting that the left seeks nothing short of total confiscation of firearms. Not just semiautomatic rifles or “assault weapons,” not universal background checks, but a ban on all easily reloadable weapons. Loud-and-proud progressives will happily acknowledge that that’s the goal. For Obama, the calculus is trickier because Hillary will have to answer next year for anything he says now and he’s apt to trigger the mother of all buying sprees at gun stores if he makes any noises about confiscation. But who knows? This guy seems to be enjoying his lame-duck freedom to tell Americans how disappointing they are. Maybe it’s time for some “hard truths” about gun ownership too. If not, then we’ll have to wait until he’s out of office for the big revelation that, yes, he supports total confiscation.
While we’re on the subject, here’s a bold idea from Jill Lawrence. Should Democrats go to the mat for gun control right now by threatening to shut down the government if the GOP refuses to agree to universal background checks?
With three people murdered and nine injured by a shooter at a Planned Parenthood facility in Colorado Springs, six children robbed of a parent, with mass shootings a regular feature of American life and gun violence stealing lives every day, why not hold out for tighter gun laws? In a way it’s poetic justice. What could be more pro-life than trying to save lives?
No money for the government unless and until we have a truly universal system of background checks for gun buyers, one that covers purchases made online and at gun shows and keeps guns out of the hands of domestic abusers and suspected terrorists. And no money for the government unless and until Congress passes a bipartisan bill that would make sure the people who most need psychiatric help are getting it, that adequate hospital beds and outpatient treatment are available, and that families receive the information they need to help.
Tightening background checks polls exceptionally well, usually north of 80 percent, so there’s reason to think the public would respond to this semi-favorably. You can write the script yourself: “This is an extraordinary procedural tactic but our epidemic of gun violence has reached a point of extraordinary crisis.” (That’s not remotely true but it makes for good copy, huh?) The problem for Dems is that, although support for background checks is high, it’s not particularly intense; if it were, the GOP would have suffered in the 2014 midterms for blocking the Toomey/Manchin bill after Sandy Hook. And of course, shutting down the government would destroy five years of Democratic rhetoric that only political terrorists would dare hold funding for the federal government hostage to their policy agenda. Right now Democrats enjoy a natural advantage in the PR battle over shutdowns, namely, that the public will tend to blame the party that’s forever criticizing government for starving it of funds. If the party that’s forever defending expansions of government suddenly turns around and cuts off the money, that perception will be muddled — and maybe not just for the duration of this particular shutdown battle. The question is this: Are universal background checks really so important to the left that they’d risk major political capital to make it happen, knowing full well that a bill like that would have done next to nothing to stop most recent mass shootings?
Obama in Paris on Planned Parenthood shooting: 'This just doesn't happen in other countries'
Obama proves day after day that he is retarded.
He did not get to were he’s at by being stupid. He may not be bright and I don’t believe he is, but he’s not stupid. He has played the American people brilliantly for 2 terms of the greatest political office on earth. Who are the stupid ones? Again, my original premise is that he truly believes he is ‘smart’ and we are stupid. In the end I believe we both agree he is a mistake that should have never happened.
He’s on something or having a mental breakdown or both.
The criticism he is FINALLY receiving as Republicans are running may be an intolerable insult to his Malignant Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
Aaand ... he was born in Canada, with an initial registry as Steven Barnard Dunham, if memory serves for spelling.
When he lifts his nose and juts his chin it bears a remarkable resemblance to Benito Mussolini.
I said that very thing to my wife today...ironic.
The question on everyone's mind is:
Is Bathhouse Barry the first, the second, or the turd burglar...?
He's said that he'll be staying around...
He'll have to.
He'll be spending the remainder of his life (and his wife's money) from history's fact finding.
Our “President” is a pathetic, dangerous, embarrassment.
0bunghole says whatever he wants to say and expects everyone to believe it's the only truth there is or ever was. He's an Ass*ole.
;)
Microdot or mescaline maybe. Gotta pay for that peyote.
Mr. President, is your brain fried like an egg in a skillet?
my president is an idiot......and a traitor.....
fl
This stupid SOB can’t be gone soon enough.
“He did not get to were he’s at by being stupid.”
He did it by following the instructions and carefully laid pathway that the non stupid people installed for him. I see no sign of him rising above stupidity.
I do not think he is even at much above average intelligence.
Or maybe in Norway.
TWO VIETNAMS! Living Side by Side. In Peace and Harmony!
Hey obama!
Remember Mumbai?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.