Posted on 12/17/2015 6:11:15 AM PST by rktman
President Obama went behind closed doors, and off official White House schedule, to meet with former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg - the nanny of city governance who's helped finance a massive campaign to challenge with National Rifle Association - and discuss gun control.
"The two discussed ways to keep guns out of the hands of those who should not have access to them and what more could be done at the state and local level to help address gun violence in America," the White House said in a statement released after the meeting.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
"The two discussed ways to keep guns out of the hands of those who should not have access to them and what more could be done at the state and local level to help address gun violence in America," the White House said in a statement released after the meeting.
Ah, yes, the pro islam, anti American political party busy meeting over how to remove more of our rights.
Expect the order to be signed Christmas Day.
So he really IS going to go for something completely lawless.
The Bloomberg deal is he wants anyone who sells ONE GUN A YEAR to be considered a dealer (if that gun was not in the possession of the seller for a year get an FFL, and do a background check.
Never mind there is nothing in the Brady Act he could twist to make that interpretation of existing law. There was variation that would require a set number of guns sold per year — number floated was fifty — to get this treatment, and that version MIGHT pass legal muster.
But if he’s meeting with Bloomberg, its the version where ONE gun (that has not been possessed a year) would be the trigger.
Look. Guys. I don’t think I live too long. Looks like it is a go-sign.
> Ah, yes, the pro islam, anti American political party busy meeting over how to remove more of our rights.
Who’s protected by 50 or more gun wielding Secret Service agents at most events. I’m sure Soros is willing to pay the biggest commission on this item on the Communist Manifesto checklist if he can pull it off...btw why isn’t someone hunting down that satanic puppetmaster and putting him out of his misery yet?
You know that he is. The only questions are when and what.
It should be clear by now ‘who should not have them’ is. Its us, rank and file America. This is about disarming the general public nothing more. Its just one more step to that end. This isnt about a gun free society tho. Its about some who will have and others who will not. The haves will herd and milk the have nots at the business end of a gun.
What a shame. I really did want to live long enough to complete Fallout 4 and maybe Skyrim.
Ah well. No worries.
> Expect the order to be signed Christmas Day.
Sorta like the UNODA arms treaty they signed on December 24 last year? Ba$tards. If ISIS strikes again on American soil I wouldn’t be surprised if it were Christmas Eve or Christmas Day. Not at all.
Selling 50 guns a year does seem excessive but how will the government know unless it keeps a database of gun buyers and forces all transfers through a FFL dealer?
I understand. The only thing I know for sure is that I will not go alive into one of obama’s or Hillary’s camps. And I hope that the traitors that inflicted obama on us are among the first to get their throats cut by the muslims.
Bloomberg is one of most vile people in public life.
Remember the Times Square bomber. Before it was discovered that the perpetrator was a Muslim terrorist, Bloomberg — with no evidence whatsoever — said it might be a Tea Party member upset with Obamacare.
When he was running his company, Bloomberg railed against female employees who became pregnant, openly telling employees that they should get an abortion.
I just had a thought.
It might be they stay with the repeatedly-floated 50 number — which would be below my ‘GO SIGN TRIGGER threshold’ — but then abuse the law to harass every seller, and thus greatly decrease the ‘velocity’ of gun exchanges.
Cash. No receipts. Sell often. Buy often.
And here I thought the people who should not have guns are the youth gangs in our cities. Those dudes tend to be in violation of numerous gun laws in liberal cities with tough gun laws.
Who? the DC police and the Secret Service?
“...keep guns out of the hands of those who should not have access to them...” Key words there. Who’s the decider?
It all comes down to “who, whom” as Lenin said.
The only reason you disarm people is to put chains
around their necks.
Anyone who opposes the regime must be disarmed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.