Posted on 12/26/2015 5:37:36 PM PST by Benny Huang
Just in case there was any lingering doubt that Planned Parenthood doesn't give a hoot about "women's health"--or anyone's health, for that matter--the abortion giant is now on record favoring the "right" of HIV-positive people not to disclose their status to sex partners.
From their pamphlet, the ironically titled "Happy, Healthy, and Hot": "Your decision about whether to disclose may change with different people and situations. You have the right to decide if, when, and how to disclose your HIV status."
Surely the pamphlet only means friends and co-workers though, right? Actually, no. The pamphlet continues: "Some countries have laws that say people living with HIV must tell their sexual partner(s) about their status before having sex, even if they use condoms or only engage in sexual activity with a low risk of giving HIV to someone else. These laws violate the rights of people living with HIV by forcing them to disclose or face the possibility of criminal charges." The pamphlet then encourages the reader to get involved to change such laws "that violate your rights."
So basically Planned Parenthood is encouraging people to pull a Charlie Sheen; or at least condoning it. The renowned actor revealed in November that he had known for about four years that he is HIV positive, though he claimed that he always informed his sex partners of his status, with "no exceptions." This came as something of a surprise to Bree Olson, Sheen's former live-in girlfriend, who thankfully tested negative. She claims that they had sex almost daily for about a year using lambskin condoms, at his insistence, which are not effective protection against HIV.
"He doesn't even value my life," said Olson about Sheen's revelation. No kidding, cupcake.
Her only purpose was to serve his pleasure. If she had to die so that he could get his rocks off, that was, in Sheen's calculation, a price worth paying. The fact that Olson has been in almost three hundred pornographic films indicates that she may not care that much about her own health and safety though Olson left the business in 2010 and has advised other women not to get involved. Perhaps she was just naïve when she got started in porn and has since had an epiphany.
It's hard to believe that such selfish people as Charlie Sheen really exist but they do and they're actually a lot more common than you might imagine. The fact that Planned Parenthood, which masquerades as a reputable medical organization, endorses the "right" not to inform sex partners of HIV status tells us that the camel has already gotten its nose under the tent. Though the attitude may not yet be mainstream, that doesn't mean it could never be.
The author and journalist Randy Shilts, who died of AIDS in 1994, shed light on the homosexual community's culture of denial in his 1987 book "And the Band Played On". Among Shilts's premises is that homosexual political leaders talked a great game when it came to combatting AIDS but their action was lacking. They refused to consider any countermeasure to the AIDS "epidemic" that might hamper their sex lives. The most they would do is promote the use of condoms. They refused to speak out against the hookup culture that pervaded and continues to pervade the male homosexual community or, heaven forbid, to tell male homosexuals to keep their butt cheeks together. They were even squeamish about identifying male homosexuals as the primary "at risk" group, preferring instead to shotgun blast their preventative message, as impoverished as it was, to the public as a whole. The message might have had more impact if it had been aimed somewhere but that would have meant identifying a demographic group and addressing the specific high-risk behaviors that made that community unique--something they were entirely unwilling to do.
One can almost understand the rationale behind this kind of reckless denialism. The disease was discovered in 1981, just a few short years after male homosexuals had established sexually "liberated" enclaves in places like New York, San Francisco, and Los Angeles. They had just escaped the moral condemnation of their conservative parents and they weren't about to give up their newfound "freedom" for anything, even if the new objection to their sexual habits was medical rather than moral. Any finger-wagging prude caught preaching that jive was not welcome at their never-ending orgy.
In the mid-1980s, the author David Horowitz, who was then on a journey from the Marxist Left to conservative Right, sat down with Randy Shilts to discuss AIDS, the burgeoning menace then stalking San Francisco. What Shilts told him was shocking. As Horowitz wrote in his biography, "Radical Son": "According to Shilts, it was the gay leaders themselves who suppressed the research findings, along with the fact--now generally accepted by medical officials--that AIDS was a sexually transmitted disease. This was difficult to believe, but when I checked Shilts's story, it turned out to be true. The Stonewall Gay Democratic Club, one of the political powers in the community, had summarized the politically correct view prevailing among activists in a slogan: 'Sex doesn't cause AIDS--a virus does.' The activists were afraid that identifying the disease with promiscuous sex and also with gay sex--95 percent of the cases in San Francisco were among homosexual males--would stigmatize the 'gay life-style' and create a political backlash."
Yeah, and we wouldn't want to stigmatize the "gay" lifestyle, would we? I don't know what's wrong with stigmatizing a filthy sexual practice rife with adverse health consequences, including AIDS of course, but also gonorrhea, anal cancer, and intestinal parasites. We stigmatize smoking, why wouldn't we stigmatize anal sex? Put me down as pro-stigma.
Unfortunately, male homosexuals whine that their rights are being violated whenever anyone looks askance at butt sex, the activity that apparently defines them. They demand not only the right to engage in dangerous, unhealthy sexual behavior, but the right to positive affirmation as well.
Sadly, the medical community seems to be fulfilling their wish. Doctors these days live in fear that their careers will be summarily ended if they advise against anal sodomy--which is pretty good medical advice, no matter how you slice it. To cite just one example, consider Dr. Paul Church, a well-respected urologist who was recently fired from his position at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) in Boston for opposing the homosexual lifestyle on moral and medical grounds. His story began in 2009 when BIDMC sent out an email inviting staff members to ride on the hospital-sponsored float in an upcoming "pride" parade. Dr. Church responded with a mass email of his own, asking why a hospital would endorse a behavior with undeniable health consequences that include death. "If a medical scientist cannot raise research that the federal government's Centers for Disease Control clearly shows homosexual conduct as harmful," he concluded, "then that means that your health, my health, medical science -- all of that is being called into question simply because of a political agenda."
He was right, of course, though it's dangerous to be right when your employer is wrong. The torrent of homosexual outrage came down on Dr. Church hard. After a lengthy fight with BIDMC, he lost his job. He may lose his positions at other Boston-area medical centers, including Harvard Medical School, where he also practices medicine.
Church was essentially fired for being a good doctor, for staying true to the Hippocratic Oath he took to "do no harm" at a time when all the other doctors around him had abandoned theirs. "Truly caring for the well-being of individuals requires telling them the truth about their choices," said Church. "The hospital does this on less controversial issues such as smoking and diet." Yes, that's true, but smokers and fat people don't have well-financed and well-organized political apparatuses and they don't crush people who get in their way. That's the difference.
The homofascists had to make an example out of somebody and they chose Dr. Church. The chilling effect will be felt far and wide--no one will dare point out that homosexuals are perverting medicine's core mission, though they plainly are.
We're living in an era of hedonism, in which a substantial portion of the population careens from disco to disco and from orgasm to orgasm. Not all such hedonists are homosexuals, of course--there is always the occasional Charlie Sheen--but a significant number of them are. There is nothing they won't do just to keep the good times rolling. They don't care about other people's health or safety, nor do they care about facts or truth. They care only about their own pleasure and they will stop at nothing to secure it.
worked next to a guy in graphics in NYC who, after telling me (and I didn’t want to hear) about numerous horrific interactions, then told me he was HIV positive.
I asked him if he told everyone. His lie was obvious and written all over his face.
on a sidenote, he wasn’t Notified by the clinic!! he just want back for kicks a few months later to double check, assuming he was negative. sheesh.
They care..... They want YOU to get it.
They want to donate blood also.
HIV positive ok to donate blood is proof that the progressive want more people to be infected.
The left, not just planned parenthood, want as many straight people to get AIDs as possible. They believe that straights who don’t have AIDs are discriminating against all the gay people who do. It’s a little like black people telling white girls they are racist if they don’t date black guys.
That's right. I believe that if you have a surgery scheduled, you can donate your own blood in advance as a precautionary measure if you should need some during the procedure. Could be wrong, maybe someone out here can clarify?
I'm scheduled for a heart cath on Wednesday with possible open heart surgery to follow. The doctor asked me how I felt about blood transfusions....
Tough question!
If you know you’re going to need a blood transfusion ahead of time you can donate your own.
So what? When they pass it on without divulging it is a crime. They’ll go to prison. Murder is still murder.
Well I don’t care if they get aids...so we’re even.
AIDS was just another “cause” they used. The Left claims victimhood to get attention (raise awareness) and get power (advance the cause) until they can violate others (in the names of equality and safety). Then the “cause” is dropped or ignored because they got the power the control over others they wanted, so they are now onto the next “cause” to get more power. The victim becomes the perpetrator....and a cyclical repeat offender.
Bank your own blood. if you can, throw in an extra pint.
Autologous donation. Make friends with O+ folks as well.
You know that meme, “I’m not saying ‘kill all stupid people’. I’m just saying that we should remove all of the warning labels and let the problem sort itself out.”
Well, it seems to me like this is what the left is doing to their own base. Let ‘em run wild and, eventually, the problem will sort itself out. Balance will be restored.
My son’s O-. I think we have a winner for our family.
Pretty fair hunter, as well.
Thanks for the reminder.
However, I’m out of state visiting the grandbabies until two days before the cath. Hopefully, if they decide to do a bypass it will take several weeks to get scheduled. I’ll bank then.
Thanks!
That's it, they are officially a terrorist group AFAIC.
I’ve been writing on here for a couple of years about the ‘AIDS Pride’ movement (not really what it is called) which seeks to decriminalize non-disclosure of AIDS status to sexual partners and close family (same dwelling).
The homofascists also want an end to the laws against sex in public washrooms. Y’see, they unfairly target homosexuals since those are the people soliciting strangers of the same sex for sex in washrooms in public parks and government offices.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.