Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton's lame Senate career
Washington Examiner ^ | 12-29-15 | Jason Russell

Posted on 12/30/2015 4:18:37 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic

For eight years, Hillary Clinton toiled away in the United States Senate, sponsoring many landmark pieces of legislation and getting them signed into law, forever changing the country.

Just kidding. Only three pieces of legislation that Clinton sponsored became law. None were of much consequence.

One renamed a post office in a New York town with fewer than 2,000 people. Another renamed a portion of highway outside Buffalo after the late Tim Russert. The third established a brick house in Troy, N.Y., as a national historic site to honor a 19th century female union leader.

During her Senate career, Clinton sponsored 713 pieces of legislation. Those were the three that became law. That's a legislative batting average of .004, and none of the bills had much consequence outside New York. For the most part, Clinton's bills were merely facelifts of public grounds.

To be fair, Clinton's Senate career started when President George W. Bush took office and ended when he left. There's not much that Clinton and Bush agreed on.

But even President Obama managed to get a couple semi-important bills passed into law. During his four years in the Senate, which also coincided with Bush's presidency, Obama sponsored 137 bills, two of which became law. But the laws were more consequential than Clinton's bills.

One Obama bill increased aid to the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Another prohibited the federal government from giving away or selling mercury.

Those laws didn't have the gravity of laws like Obamacare, but at least they did something of substance.

Getting legislation to become law isn't the only way a senator can have an impact on the country, but it is the most important way. By this metric, Clinton failed to do much of anything for the American people. As she runs for president in 2016, let us remember her miserable Senate record.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: failure; hillaryclinton; legislation; record; senate

1 posted on 12/30/2015 4:18:37 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic; Nachum

For your list.


2 posted on 12/30/2015 4:19:27 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

About as important as everything she has done, non-existent.

So, “At this point, what difference does it make?”


3 posted on 12/30/2015 4:34:18 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

And let’s review her time as Secretary of State as well. That job was allegedly going to beef up her resume, and impress us voters with her foreign policy credentials.......


4 posted on 12/30/2015 4:40:50 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

And she carpet bagged her way into NY


5 posted on 12/30/2015 4:42:32 AM PST by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Didn’t work, did it?


6 posted on 12/30/2015 4:44:00 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Somehow, I am uncomfortable measuring the success of U.S. Senators by the number of laws they get passed.

As far as I am concerned, the fewer laws the better, and the laws we most desperately need to see passed pass are those repealing the other stupid/evil/politically self-serving laws that are already on the books.


7 posted on 12/30/2015 4:46:55 AM PST by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Why the hell is the criteria for senators or congressmen being successful the number of laws they get enacted ?

We have too damn many laws

And they create government organizations and then there is no oversight
8 posted on 12/30/2015 4:47:03 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Somehow, I am uncomfortable measuring success of US Senators by the number of bills they get passed.

Why? Perhaps because Cruz worked so hard to get the first TPA passed?

It's not just the number of bills Hillary got passed. It's that all three are frivolous wastes of time and energy, while everything in the US was careening toward the trash heap of failed civilizations.

Can't wait to see the ads comparing what Trump accomplished during those years vs what hillary accomplished. Think about it. Trump did more for job creation, world diplomacy, and the economy than anyone in the US did. And that's the GOOD part of her resume?

9 posted on 12/30/2015 5:11:23 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

She Who Must Not Be Named simply used the Senate seat formerly belonging to Dan Moynihan as her trampoline to the White House (She was promised that seat, and the Kennedys be damned).

Her time at State was simply to tighten the trampoline for a better bounce.


10 posted on 12/30/2015 5:14:21 AM PST by Old Sarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

Bump! Her “private server” and the Clinton Foundation broke the trampoline.


11 posted on 12/30/2015 5:20:44 AM PST by upchuck (Happiness never decreases by being shared.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Somehow, I am uncomfortable measuring the success of U.S. Senators by the number of laws they get passed.

In order to change existing bad laws, new laws need to be implemented, even if it is just to erase the current law. For example, I'm sure most people on this forum would welcome a new law repealing Obamacare, even though it would require a new law being passed.

12 posted on 12/30/2015 5:21:04 AM PST by Go Gordon (Barack McGreevey Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

That remains to be seen.

Remember that She Who Must Not Be Named could eat a live negro fetus on “The View”, and Whoopi would praise Her for performing a post-partum abortion, and the other hags would compliment her lovely silverware set.


13 posted on 12/30/2015 5:26:43 AM PST by Old Sarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Go Gordon
In order to change existing bad laws, new laws need to be implemented, even if it is just to erase the current law.

Yes. That is what I meant when I wrote:

As far as I am concerned, the fewer laws the better, and the laws we most desperately need to see passed pass are those repealing the other stupid/evil/politically self-serving laws that are already on the books.

14 posted on 12/30/2015 5:28:30 AM PST by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Don’t forget her vendetta against cockfighting. The Mexicans should remember this well.


15 posted on 12/30/2015 5:34:51 AM PST by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Hillary Clinton toiled away in the United States Senate

Hillary never works she is strictly a show horse whether US Senator or Secretary of State. Her original plan was to move from Senator to President. This got interrupted so to maintain political visibility she grabbed at a chance to become a figurehead Secretary of State. In the first two years she was flying around aimlessly all the time with Huma, meeting up with various heads of State for photo ops.

I will give her credit for having very good constituent services while a Senator. But to pull this off all you need to do is have enough brains to hire an excellent office manager

16 posted on 12/30/2015 5:36:33 AM PST by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Another prohibited the federal government from giving away or selling mercury.

Who would want to buy it? The EPA would probably block any efforts at mining, and the asteroids are closer in any case.

17 posted on 12/30/2015 6:49:29 AM PST by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson