Posted on 01/01/2016 3:59:21 AM PST by Helicondelta
Pardon my lack of manners; I meant to add:
—Happy New Year to you!
He is an Affirmative Action. It was given to him. For him, the Bar Exam consisted of two parts: 1. Knowing his name——10% 2. Neatness of the answer sheet-——— 90%
Ask Ted that question.
In today's ranking o corporate boogey-men, perhaps so.
Still, you would judge a person based on where their wife was employed?
Seems a little silly is all. But if that's your choice...
Goldman runs the world. Try following the dots. Heidi is actually more powerful than Ted, up until he is potus, then Goldman is more powerful.
‘’... hoping for an appointment myself’’
I’d support you!
LIBbylu is slow this morning. Her anti-Trump stinkbombs usually show up in the first 10 replies in a Trump thread.
She must have been immoral last night celebrating NYE and slept in this morning.
I doubt it, though.
I prefer European imports, lol. I’m not running for potus...although I would be pretty good.
Can't be. I thought the CFR did that.
Or is it the Illuminati?
Common denominator GS.
The problem with being ideologically pure is that it is impossible. No two people who ever existed will see the world the same. Any “politician” who tries to be all things to all people will end up disappointing everyone. Past and current associations by one person to another will always upset and disappoint the ideologically rigid and inflexible. Purity is fundamentally impossible.
Especially when you are on leave from Goldman!!
I’m with both of you, Trump is going to pick a Trump II, someone who is more like himself, and less like anyone else running.
Someone who does things, and doesn’t just talk and debate.
Thank God America is awakening.
Jeff Sessions, maybe?
Nice.
Very nice.
Using crowd size as an indicator of who is going to win the primary at this point is pretty much pointless. Sure, Trump gets huge crowds because he's a celeb stumping in small towns and gets 24/7 media attention for now. But he also doesn't do internal polling, has yet to seriously spend any money on his campaign, has not hit the quotas needed for precinct captains in Iowa and his get the vote out effort is anemic at best. I remember getting excited about the Romney crowds in 2012 thinking these were signs Obama was going to get his commie ass kicked, but then election night came and we all know how that went down.
In my honest opinion we should ban lawyers from the supreme court bench, most of them don’t seem to understand the constitution.
Unfair comparison. Romney had already won the nomination. Trump is just a candidate with huge crowds.
I don’t think it’s unfair if Trump was so dominant and the inevitable nominee how come he’s trailing in Iowa despite getting these huge crowds?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.