But...Heidi's resume/c.v. is diametrically the opposite of Cruz's stated positions.
There is a revolving door that much has been written about between government and Goldman Sachs and other banksters. The Cruzs are part of this revolving door. And would someone ask, what was Heidi's role and where was she in 2008 and the bank bailout? She was an adviser---what did she advise? (Note that Goldman Sachs was the recipient of billions of dollars---how many billions is variously stated in the literature of the events.)
You could not write a better GLOBALIST resume than Heidi's.
This difference is far more stark than that of, for example, Mary Matalin and James Carville.
I note also that the Wikipedia version of Heidi's bio is quite different by its omissions, with no mention of several of the career highlights here.
The new paradigm we must understand is that we are now in an existential fight, and the opponents are Globalists versus Nationalists.
Cruz's stated nationalist positions simply are now reconcilable with Heidi's globalist/bankster life.
It may explain a lot of things---the Cruz TPP vote, for one. His proposal for 500,000 more H1-B visas. Opposition to deportation. Reticence to build a wall. And so forth.
Be honest friends. When the existential threat to the USA is defeated, we can then sort out our conservative vs. socialist differences. Meanwhile, if we don't have a nation---i.e., if the Globalists defeat us NATIONALISTS, it's all moot.
Is Heidi's allegiance to America and to her husband, or to her employer and to the WTO and the "free traders" (dog whistle code for free access to US markets by all other countries, but tariffs for US goods going to other markets---tariffs so high as to make trade prohibitive. Please study TRADE DEFICITS.)
Finally, the WTO and CFR do NOT have the interest of the USA at heart. The BANKS are the LEADERS in open borders and flooding America with cheap labor.
To all Freepers: please set emotion aside and consider this: Globalists versus Nationalists. THAT is the new paradigm with government. If there is no nation, there will be no conservative or liberal. Only globalism enforced by the powers that be, the UN, bank cartels, etc.
That’s nice. Go Trump.
Agree 100%
“I support the Task Force report and its recommendations aimed at building a safer and more prosperous North America. Economic pros- perity and a world safe from terrorism and other security threats are no doubt inextricably linked.” -Heidi Cruz, Building A North American Community, Council on Foreign Relations.
http://www.cfr.org/canada/building-north-american-community/p8102
Just considering the effort that Heidi is putting into getting Ted elected I would suspect that he is on board with her program.
Just imagine the outcry if any other candidate had a spouse with those credentials...Goldman Sachs and CFR....
Why Bush-44 is so against of Cruz? Something had happened between them.
This thread should be good. Facts are facts. All anyone can do is whine that it’s not fair, and try to convince us that he opposes everything his wife is trying to do. lol
Nothing will change with the other politicians running - nothing. It’s Trump or mediocrity will still reign.
I’m in complete agreement. It happens that conservatives and Republicans are more inherently inclined toward nationalism, i.e. the basic defense a nation’s people, borders, culture, etc. But yes, Cruz is a globalist, makes sense since he’s a dual citizen.
So, you’d think the GOPe would find Cruz to be a very acceptable candidate. Why don’t they?
Stick to facts, unless of course you like operating like a liberal.
♦ Ted Cruz was for South American Refugees (2014 – linkhttp://theconservativetreehouse.com/2014/07/17/soccer-balls-sanctimony-and-a-billion-dollar-group-called-baptist-child-and-family-services/) “Soccer Ball and Teddy Bear Delivery†before he was against SA/Mexican refugees and promoting a border wall (2015) – He cannot square that factual circle
♦ Ted Cruz was for Trade Promotion Authority (2015 – link http://paulryan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398270 ), before he was against Trade Promotion Authority (2015) – He cannot square that factual circle. ~ Research Outline
♦ Ted Cruz was for Taking More Syrian Refugees (2014 – link https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7-nLXGoSjpg ), specifically dismissing the threat of terror embeds, before he was against taking Syrian Refugees (2015 – link) – He cannot square that factual circle. ~ Research Outline
♦ Ted Cruz was against Ethanol Subsidies (2013 – link https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/senate-bill/1195/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22%5C%22renewable+fuel+standard%5C%22%22%5D%7D&resultIndex=3 ), before he was for Ethanol Subsidies (2016 – link) – He cannot square that factual circle. ~ Research Outline
♦ Ted Cruz was for Anchor Baby Birthright Citizenship (2011 – link https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=4zBW8vLnRDY ), before he was against “birthright citizenship†(2015 – link) – He cannot square that factual circle. ~ Research Outline
♦ Ted Cruz was for the Iran Deal “Corker Cardin Amendment†(2015 – link http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c114:H.R.1191:), before he was against the Iran Deal (2015 – link) – He cannot square that factual circle. ~ Research Outline
♦ Ted Cruz was for Mitch McConnell (2014 – link http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2014/01/30/ugh-ugh-ugh-rand-paul-and-ted-cruz-tell-sean-hannity-well-stay-out-of-any-gop-primary-race-that-involves-incumbents/ ), before he was against Mitch McConnell (2014 link) – He cannot square that factual circle. ~ Research outline
♦ Ted Cruz was against Chris McDaniel (2014 – link http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2014/07/09/ted-cruz-works-to-clarify-his-gop-position-as-nrsc-vice-chair-as-nrsc-is-found-to-be-behind-mississippi-vote-fraud-efforts/), before he was for Chris McDaniel (2015) – He cannot square that factual circle – Research outline
Ted Cruz campaign head admits the need to use psychological operations, religion and manipulation to convince voters to support Ted Cruz. – READ HERE –
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/12/13/ted-cruz-campaign-head-credits-psychological-operations-as-primary-source-of-voter-support/
Mercer appears to be buying the WH to get rid of his 6 billion Tax fraud issue .
The left and the Clinton machine will wipe him out in a series of well placed TV ads! Just read this leftist rags hit piece and multiply by 1,000
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/04/10/meet-ted-cruz-s-tax-dodging-sugar-daddy.html
We do not need another Billionaire puppet in the WH .
We have the Soros puppet right now !
Soros had a 2 billion tax fraud issue just go away !
the whole thing I just posted was courtesy of Sundance at The Conservative Treehouse and here is the link for the whole page:
Clearly an outsider just like her husband who attended elite schools and leveraged high level connections and was elected to the worlds most exclusive club before he became an outsider himself.
She seems like an intelligent and gracious lady....and those two kids are just adorable :-)
I’d still like for Cruz to be Trump’s VP. I don’t think he can win this time as top of the ticket... but I really like the man.
I’m having trouble trusting any of these candidates, including Cruz. I am reminded that Scripture says, “Put not your trust in princes, in a son of man, in whom there is no salvation.” (Psalm 146:3)
Her work at the CFR authoring their report on the North American Union can be found here: http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2015/04/04/is-ted-cruz-an-advocate-of-a-north-american-union/>
A whole threadful of crap. Queue the spooky music and black helicopters.
.
The posts in this thread show how loose Trumpophants run with the truth.
You disgrace this site deeply.
Enjoy your Kook Klatch.
Your lover is going down in flames.
.