Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jeb Bush Pledges Military Action in Middle East if President - To Take Out Assad?!?
Micheal Medved Show | 1/12/16 | Jeb Bush

Posted on 01/12/2016 12:18:05 PM PST by ifinnegan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: ifinnegan

Good grief. What insanity. I’m sure Jeb! still thinks the Iraq War was a resounding success. Let’s forget about the terrorists. We have a wonderful opportunity to take out the dictator Assad and feel good about ourselves. What does it matter if the resulting power vacuum opens the door for a full-on ISIS take over? Such a little matter—better to just ignore it.

This is a major part of the reason why Jeb! is on my “Write in Trump’s name instead” list along with Kasich, in the unlikely event either of them should be the nominee.


61 posted on 01/12/2016 3:56:40 PM PST by FenwickBabbitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Sounds like Jeb is attempting to set a record for PURE STUPIDITY and prove that he can still be elected that way.

But he won’t. No Guinness Book entry for him.


62 posted on 01/12/2016 4:53:55 PM PST by BobL (Who cares? He's going to build a wall and stop this invasion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Great. Jeb wants another war.

Bush War III

He really needs a new play book.


63 posted on 01/12/2016 4:58:34 PM PST by xzins (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Is there anyone reading this that is for Jeb? Just curious.


64 posted on 01/12/2016 9:16:22 PM PST by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

Jeb Bush is a jackass.

On the other hand, maybe he WANTS chaos in the Middle East. Pretty hard for Islam to start World War III when it is engaged in a Civil War.


65 posted on 01/13/2016 6:06:25 AM PST by baltimorepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: baltimorepoet
On the other hand, maybe he WANTS chaos in the Middle East. Pretty hard for Islam to start World War III when it is engaged in a Civil War.

I've often wondered whether the real goal of "regime change" and "nation building" is to send once semi-stable countries into chaos. The only other alternative is that the advocates of these policies are extremely naive and are stupid enough to think that western style republican governments will take root in the Middle East and elsewhere in the Third World.

If the goal is to create chaos, it's still a misguided one, since terrorist organizations can flourish in times of civil war in ways that they can't under the stable rule of an autocrat.

66 posted on 01/13/2016 7:52:44 AM PST by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ek_hornbeck

[I]I’ve often wondered whether the real goal of “regime change” and “nation building” is to send once semi-stable countries into chaos.

If the goal is to create chaos, it’s still a misguided one, since terrorist organizations can flourish in times of civil war in ways that they can’t under the stable rule of an autocrat.[/I]

I suspect that the statists present in the intelligence bureaucracy may be controlling the flow of information (first to GWB, then to Obama) to encourage actions that would result in chaos, more terrorism, and more power for said intelligence bureaucracy. That is why certain policies between GWB and Obama didn’t change.

I suspect the reason for this is that continued globalization (the working class jobs moving to China, and the white collar jobs moving to India) will result in a disgruntled former Middle Class and political instability that will require a police state to tamp down, absent any attempt to make globalism more equitable for the Middle Class.

I suspect at some point, increased terrorist attacks using small arms such as in San Bernadino will lead the GOPe to abandon the 2nd amendment and support yet more of this hidden 4th branch of government’s agenda, which would include more surveillance of Americans.

It is interesting that Trump policies against China and against immigration (espec from Middle East) would be at odds with trying to create a police state in the US.


67 posted on 01/13/2016 8:00:53 AM PST by baltimorepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson