Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/14/2016 9:35:48 AM PST by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: aimhigh

Let’s let Bill Gates take care of the security of elections.

What could go wrong?


2 posted on 01/14/2016 9:36:54 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("The goal of socialism is communism." -- Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

Gee how did we ever get along with paper ballots for all of those years?


3 posted on 01/14/2016 9:37:52 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

I will never believe O won the last election fairly. The electronic voting machines handed him just about whatever outcome they are commanded to release.


4 posted on 01/14/2016 9:46:22 AM PST by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

Screw this. Paper trail that can be proved and investigated and vigorously prosecuted when anybody screws with it.


6 posted on 01/14/2016 9:47:03 AM PST by Riley (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

The touch-screen machines output goes to a Soros company for vote tabulation. When the votes are counted there is no more record anywhere of the vote, only the final count itself. Recounting is not possible. Consider.


7 posted on 01/14/2016 9:47:06 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

I say we move the federal tax filing document day to match voting selection day. I also say that the individual’s vote should be contained in the body of the tax return filing.


9 posted on 01/14/2016 9:49:03 AM PST by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

I’d trust 15 year old software a lot further than I’d trust modern code.


11 posted on 01/14/2016 9:53:09 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

Electronic touch screen voting, NO. Optical scan voting, YES.


12 posted on 01/14/2016 9:56:12 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

Last I heard, Houston, TX never did solve the case of all the voting machines being burned up.

When we voted a couple months ago, hubby told the lady the machine flipped some of his votes. She just replied that’s why you have to review your choices before you hit enter. Uh, yeah, so why did they get flipped? And what if they flip after you hit enter? Don’t know the brand name or tech name for these particular machines but it’s not touch screen. These you have to scroll down, highlight your choice and hit enter.


13 posted on 01/14/2016 9:58:34 AM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

the more we reply on technology, the more opportunity for chicanery or worse to occur.


17 posted on 01/14/2016 10:15:59 AM PST by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh
Microsoft is using its cloud technology and tablets in the election process.

Like that's supposed to reassure me?


18 posted on 01/14/2016 10:20:37 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh
My town and many others in this state are using optical readers with paper ballots that are over 25 years old.

There have been no calls to replace them since they are built like a A-10 Thunderbolt and just keep on working.

I think if an item to replace them with electronic touch screen machines came up at Town Meeting, it would be soundly defeated.

21 posted on 01/14/2016 10:26:12 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Democracy is not freedom. Democracy is simply majoritarianism. It is incompatible with real freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh
Without some sort of printed acknowledgement of each vote, recounts aren't actual recounts but mere validations of the initial count (unless you allow leftists to throw "newly-discovered" ballots into the mix, in which case how is it a "recount?"). There has been an organization working on the issue of voting system integrity for some years, the Open Voting Consortium. They seem to be non-partisan; at least the problems they identify and the solutions they propose seem rational and acceptable.
23 posted on 01/14/2016 11:06:38 AM PST by Doug Loss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

All votes should be recorded on paper ballots that are retained until the tallies scanned from them are accepted. Nothing else leaves physical evidence as proof. Electronic systems were meant to be cheated. Stalin was right - whoever counts the votes controls the outcome.


24 posted on 01/14/2016 11:10:44 AM PST by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

Al franken got an empty trunk if anyone is interested in storage.


25 posted on 01/14/2016 11:43:27 AM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson