Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lacrew

there were several acts that were created to protect people of ethnicities- and rightfully so I believe because a person should not be discriminated against because of their ethnicity- This protects white folks as well as other races as well as it is now illegal for a Mexican business to deny service to white folks- etc- it protects all ethnicities- A genetic trait should not be a cause for discrimination as we are all one (in terms of ethnic equality) under one God

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_anti-discrimination_acts


45 posted on 01/18/2016 10:08:29 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Bob434

Homosexuality is not a genetic trait.
Nor will any “gay gene” be found as it doesn’t exist.
Genetically self deleting genes do not get passed on to offspring that cannot be produced in such “unions”.


46 posted on 01/18/2016 10:12:00 AM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Bob434
and rightfully so I believe because a person should not be discriminated against because of their ethnicity

And therein lies the rub. Most people in this country find racial discrimination wrong so we allow government to take away the right of assembly from those who would discriminate based on race. In doing so we allow government to dictate what type of discrimination is illegal, and shouldn't be surprised when it uses that power to criminalize a type of discrimination we do find acceptable, or necessary.

47 posted on 01/18/2016 10:18:04 AM PST by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Bob434

“I believe because a person should not be discriminated against because of their ethnicity”

By whom?

The government? If so, I concur wholeheartedly.

Private people/businesses? Not in the constitution. I understand it may be in the CRA, but I find it nowhere in the constitution. I just do not understand what business it is of the government’s, if Farmer Billie doesn’t want to host lesbian Sally’s wedding. It obviously makes him uncomfortable, and he has stated it violates his religion - so why should the heavy hand of government pro-actively force him to perform an act he abhors?


59 posted on 01/18/2016 10:47:12 AM PST by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson