It’s their freakin’ land. So then, they can marry, but they are not allowed onto the yard/land - perhaps that can be the ruling. SCOTUS would likely - if they would take the case - rule in favor of the land owners. Private property is private property - this isn’t like the bakery case (which also was an immoral ruling). Correct me if wrong, isn’t the air above the land also property of the landowners up to a point?
I don’t know how SCOTUS would rule, as I don’t understand any of the underlying reasoning for this case or the bakery case. I have never understood how the power of law could be used to interfere with a private business’s decision on who to serve.