Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/29/2016 9:36:34 PM PST by drewh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
To: drewh

If Bloomberg runs Repubs win


2 posted on 01/29/2016 9:39:02 PM PST by BridgeOutAhead (Obama.....dabit deus his quoque finem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh
Run Bloomer, Run.

Split the Democrat ticket and guarantee a Republican win!

3 posted on 01/29/2016 9:39:09 PM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

It’s the only way Trump wins.


4 posted on 01/29/2016 9:39:49 PM PST by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh
... the survey found that 29% of Americans would support Bloomberg in a theoretical three-way race ...

Thanks Drew, we needed the laugh.

5 posted on 01/29/2016 9:39:53 PM PST by Byron_the_Aussie (Michelle Obama, The Early Years: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBYGxBlFOSU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Frank Luntz is an idiot, ESPECIALLY if he believes his own polls. If Bloomie ran 3rd party, Trump would probably win all 50 states.


7 posted on 01/29/2016 9:42:05 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

This is laughable.

3 out of 10 people vote for Bloomberg?

Most people outside of NYC don’t even know who he is.

Luntz just makes stuff up.


12 posted on 01/29/2016 9:47:48 PM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh; onyx; All
(A BIG Thank You to FReeper "onyx" for the pic!!)

 photo Frank Luntz Focus Group.jpg

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help To Keep FR In The Battle !!


Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


13 posted on 01/29/2016 9:48:41 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Pauline Kael has just entered the building.


14 posted on 01/29/2016 9:51:38 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Bloomberg would never get 29%.


15 posted on 01/29/2016 9:51:40 PM PST by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittancez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Drunk on their own flop sweat.


18 posted on 01/29/2016 9:51:56 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

I wonder what his stance is on gun control?


20 posted on 01/29/2016 9:52:57 PM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

At best, Bloomberg is a cone of Hillary. A weasley anti gun zealot. He cannot gain a single GOP vote.


21 posted on 01/29/2016 9:53:25 PM PST by DesertRhino ("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

So does that mean only 37% of Americans support the 2nd amendment?
Why would anyone vote for an anti gun/ anti big gulps candidate?


22 posted on 01/29/2016 9:55:08 PM PST by sockmonkey (Donald Trump will ban auto-correct with an Executive Order. Go Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh


23 posted on 01/29/2016 9:56:50 PM PST by MacNaughton (" ...it is better to die on the losing side than to live under Communism." Whitaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

A guy with a name that has become synonymous with Wall Street elitism running against Trump.


24 posted on 01/29/2016 10:04:26 PM PST by ObamahatesPACoal (Savage BLASTS Megyn Kelly, Fox News Over Treatment Of Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

I think you guys fail to see the strategy played here.

Bloomie goes out and could likely win four states (I think California could be one). If you do the law of averages....none of the three would then cross the 270 electoral vote margin....thus the election then goes to the House to decide which one of the three they support.

Most people don’t realize....after the Electoral College is dismissed and the House gets the job....it’s a fifty-state election....state-by-state. So a bunch of promises will have to be made and squared away. Twenty-six groups of political players will be enough to appoint the winner.

In this scenario, Bloomberg doesn’t really have to do that well. He only has to win a couple of states (one big state is necessary)....to push this into a House election instead of a Electoral College election.


25 posted on 01/29/2016 10:04:40 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Doesn’t that troll Luntz still think Rubio is in the lead?


26 posted on 01/29/2016 10:05:10 PM PST by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh
At this point, Bloomberg is pretty much the same thing as Bernie Sanders to the 20% of people who pay no attention whatsoever to anything until after Labor Day, and mostly vote on the basis of what happens in the last 72 hours before the election; in other words Luntz is polling a race between Hillary, Trump, and "Generic Name Recognition."

Once the Clinton Attack machine and Trump goes to work on Bernie/Bloomberg full time either/both will be a pile of smoking garbage.

29 posted on 01/29/2016 10:09:24 PM PST by FredZarguna (You did not see what I did there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh
There is no way Bloomberg would get 29% of the national vote.

Bloomberg’s only issues are confiscation of guns and taxpayer funding of abortion. Most Americans oppose these positions.

He is also the ultimate nanny state Stalinist who wants to ban lemonade and soft drinks.

Bloomberg would only get votes in the NYC area, New Jersey and Connecticut. He is not even popular enough to get elected Governor of NY State.

On top of that his personality is so obnoxious that most Americans would find him unbearable.

The good thing is he would help the Republican candidate and hurt the Democrats.

32 posted on 01/29/2016 10:15:37 PM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

I don’t think so, he might get some idiot liberals to support him and his anti gun crusade but they won’t support his micromanaging their food and drink. And the president can’t be taking off to his island retreat every weekend either, no matter how many vacations Lord Foul has set the precedent to take.


35 posted on 01/29/2016 10:21:01 PM PST by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson