The Spectator starts out with a lie in its first paragraph and then expects its readers to keep on from there. Pretty sure I just saw a damn interview with Trump where he specifically rejected single payer and explained his position, but these schmucks are still claiming that Trump supports single payer? Screw the Spectator and these constant anti-Trump propaganda threads.
TAS - The American Spectator; I guess if this is a common abbreviation, that is one thing. I thought of something else but I usually always enjoy the articles the Poster posts.
It's called problem-solving. That's what Trump does best.
No, no, no. It’s Donald Trump, therefore it’s brilliant. GENIUS, even.
And everybody and everything else is a dummy loser. Or something.
The article should be titled “Trump IS on Drugs!”
The GOPe and libs (and lawyers) are great at giving excuses at why you can’t do something, but not so great at innovation. That’s what a career in government and no real executive experience will to a person. Turn their brain into mush.
It seems that all the respected conservative publications have concluded that Trump is no conservative. the tactic of his supporters is very Alinskyite - attack the opposition and try to bully it into silence. Since the tactcde is liberal, and the many of Trump’s positions are liberal, I wonder about his supporters.
There is an old Jewish proverb: If one many says you have ass’s ears, you may ignore him, but if two men say you have ass’s ears, procure a saddle. More than two serious conservative publications have said that Trump has ass’s ears.
“Donald Trump has never met a dumb health care idea he didn’t like.”
... and I’m supposed to read past this first sentence WHY?
George: âYou said that Ted Cruz is a liar, but you have said that everyone should be covered by healthcare and the governments going to pay for it. How is that not..â
Trump:
âI want people taken care of, I have a heart. I want people taken care of, if people have no money we have to help people. But that doesnât mean single payer, it means that we have to help people. If somebody has no money and theyâre lying in the middle of the street and theyâre dying, Iâm going to take care of that and get them back to health. We are going to work with our hospitals, we are going to work with our doctors. We have to do something.
You canât have a small percentage of our economy because they are down and out, absolutely no protection so they end up dying from what you haveâ¦you know you can have a simple procedure or a pill, we will work something out. That doesnât mean single payer. I mean maybe heâs got no heart and if this means I lose an election, thatâs fine.
We have to take care of the people in our country, we canât let them die on the sidewalks of New York, or the sidewalks of Iowa, or anywhere else. So, thatâs not single payer.
So as so far as Obamacare is concerned, one of the staples of my speech, you can ask any of my many supporters is to repeal and replace Obamacare. Itâs a disaster, the premiums are going up 25 35 45 percent George you take a look at whatâs going on with Obamacare is an outrage, itâs probably going to fail on its own. Unless the republicans renew it like they have been in 17, in 17 Obamacare is going to fail on itâs own, But a whole staple of my campaign is repeal and getting rid of Obamacare.â
Forget it.
They deny Trump’s own words. If you can’t convince them by posting Trump’s own words, it’s doubtful anything will convince them. They’re committed. Their too deeply emotionally attached at this point to be convinced of anything.
Whenever a truth about the Trumpster is pointed out to them the pattern is the same.
1)Blast the source
2)Bring up Cruz, Reagan, ect ect
3)Attack the source and writer
4)Attack the poster
5)Tell you “you’re taking it out of context”
6)Attack the source and the writer
7)Make you the issue
8)Tell you “but he’s changed”
9)Attack the source and the writer
The Donald's left leaning political acumen starts as a trickle. Everyone ready for the flood?
When you start your article with a lie, people simply dismiss you latest infantile bile lace screed as more of the same ignorant nonsense
Poor El, his candidate sucks so bad he is reduced to posting infantile snarks and bile laced lies at the other candidates.
Sadly, the Conservative purist position on this issue is only sellable to a small minority of voters.
Thank you once again, Chamber of Commerce, for trashing the brand.
Oh my goodness. A customer negotiating a price with a supplier? Who ever heard of such a think.
The derangement is running strong this morning with the name-calling swirling around this entirely reasonable proposition.
Just deliver 100 stories of concrete and send me the bill. Your usual terms will do! No one but and idiot makes that kind of deal. Oh except a liberal or a Cruzer thinking this is the "free market" at work.
My guess is that VP will be from OH or PA or some other swing state.