Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Strategy

I don’t think Saudi Arabia HAS 20K tanks, much less crews for them.


6 posted on 02/15/2016 5:22:07 AM PST by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Little Ray

Exactly! Where do these numbers come from? They sound Biblical.


8 posted on 02/15/2016 5:24:22 AM PST by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Little Ray; oldplayer

I think the author added up the military equipment list of all the participating countries and not the equipment that will be deployed for the exercise!


10 posted on 02/15/2016 5:32:07 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Little Ray

There is probably a lot of old T-54/55 in that count.


11 posted on 02/15/2016 5:32:40 AM PST by MCF (If my home can't be my Castle, then it will be my Alamo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Little Ray

20,000 tanks is something like 50-100 armored divisions, an order of magnitude more than the entire world has. Maybe 20,000 personnel assigned to armored or cavalry units, implying 200-500 tanks?


13 posted on 02/15/2016 5:35:04 AM PST by only1percent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Little Ray

Nor do they have 2,500 combat aircraft. There are only five major air bases in Saudi, and I never saw anywhere near five hundred F-15s at any of them.


23 posted on 02/15/2016 5:43:40 AM PST by Rummyfan (Let us now try liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Little Ray

Combine everything on tracks from all the Gulf countries and the African countries mentioned and the numbers would look very sizeable. But Pakistan’s share would still represent more than half of whatever number they can, on paper, muster. Problem, however, is getting those resources across the Arabian Sea past Iran and into the Gulf would present some genuine logistical “issues”. The “civil war” in Syria is a potential trigger for a general Sunni on Shia conflagration, which in turn could bring in bigger players. And the Kerry / Obama policy has been to feed that fire.


34 posted on 02/15/2016 6:16:34 AM PST by katana (Just my opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Little Ray

“I don’t think Saudi Arabia HAS 20K tanks, much less crews for them.”

Yea, that was Cold War levels in Europe. It REALLY stuck out...makes all the numbers non-credible.

Perhaps they count Toyota Technicals as tanks out there.


47 posted on 02/15/2016 6:39:14 AM PST by BobL (Who cares? He's going to build a wall and stop this invasion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Little Ray

I thought 20,000 tanks sounded wrong.


67 posted on 02/15/2016 8:37:58 AM PST by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Little Ray

“I don’t think Saudi Arabia HAS 20K tanks, much less crews for them.”

No poop, Sherlock. Maybe 300 or so, which is still A LOT for a 3rd world shitehole:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Saudi_Air_Force

Not to mention, as you point out, good luck with them having that many competent warcraft drivers.

And about a 1000 tanks (not 20,000), which is still a lot:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudi_Arabian_Army#Tanks

Once again, unlikely that they have that many skilled crews.

Whoever wrote the article is a gold-plated eejit or simply an ignorant propagandist who thinks the rest of the world is as stupid as he is.


68 posted on 02/15/2016 8:46:43 AM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Little Ray

You are ight...and the title of the article is not accurate.

This is an exercise involving many nations. If Turkey, Jordan, Chad, the Sudan, Pakistan, and others all participate as they say, then they could get to the numbers indicated.
\
But 20,000 tanks is still a huge number to try and reach even in that case...much less to organize and then logistically support in any way.

We shall see what actually becomes of this “plan.”


82 posted on 02/15/2016 9:57:34 AM PST by Jeff Head (Semper Fidelis - Molon Labe - Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Little Ray
I don’t think Saudi Arabia HAS 20K tanks, much less crews for them.

Around a thousand battle tanks. Add another 3,000 or so from Egypt, and what other allies have, you're correct I'm sure. However this is the media, and I suspect they include fighting vehicles as "tanks", which adds another 4 or 5 thousand for the Saudis, probably upwards of 6 thousand for Egypt depending how you distinguish a fighting vehicle from a personnel carrier. That gets them in the ballpark, especially with other allies. Are they really deploying them, significant if they are. The 2,500 aircraft might be exaggerated.

92 posted on 02/15/2016 11:14:39 AM PST by SJackson (What I’m watching in him (O), is uncertainty...a leader doesn’t give sh*t...he gets it don)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Little Ray
I don't think Saudi Arabia HAS 20K tanks

I agree. Someone is delusional and/or fibbin' here, lol.

95 posted on 02/15/2016 11:18:16 AM PST by Mr Apple ( NO SUMMER RECESS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Little Ray

That’s the first thing that struck me as well.


97 posted on 02/15/2016 11:20:19 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson