Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz must recuse himself on Scalia replacement (Guess why?)
CNN ^ | February 15, 2016 | Professor Steven Lubet

Posted on 02/15/2016 2:29:59 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

There ain’t no such a thang as conflict a interest if’n Cruz don’t know which a way the nominee would vote on Cruz’s issue. Maybe do that if Schumer recuses himself for being a jackass.


21 posted on 02/15/2016 2:44:18 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Obama Rules of Engagement: Hands up Don't Shoot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: major-pelham
You needn’t be an NBC to be a Senator. This is baloney.

But Cruz could promote a judge who seeks to destroy the constitutional meaning of Natural Born Citizen so that Cruz can be President.

22 posted on 02/15/2016 2:46:51 PM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

More whining from a faux intellectual-and I never heard “recusal” in reference to anything but the judiciary.


23 posted on 02/15/2016 2:49:42 PM PST by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: major-pelham
You needn't be an NBC to be a Senator.

That is certainly correct although the author may later in the article argue Cruz is not even a U.S. citizen.

I'll never know what the learned prof is arguing because I didn't get by:
Cruz, however, has an unresolvable conflict of interest...

24 posted on 02/15/2016 2:53:38 PM PST by frog in a pot (That a NBC can be born in a foreign country to a foreign parent delights the one-world crowd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

This is an unintended consequence of Cruz not getting the Natural Born Citizen issue settled before running for President.


25 posted on 02/15/2016 2:54:07 PM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I wonder what Lubet's take was on Justice Kagan taking part in the decision National Association of Manufacturer's v. Sebelius.
26 posted on 02/15/2016 2:54:13 PM PST by henkster (Hillary Clinton's supporters are beginning to realize they are fettered to a corpse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

He has to recuse himself based on a hypothethetical? ANY Senator could be tried by the Supreme Court in the future.


27 posted on 02/15/2016 2:55:56 PM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

lol

more stupid Canada stuff!


28 posted on 02/15/2016 3:02:49 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caver

A family member (I try to distance myself from them) said the same thing. Obama nominates and they just say yes! is what he said...

then I asked ‘then what is the point of going through the senate? if they are just to rubber stamp the judge and send them to the court it is a wasted step right?”

It didn’t set in, and telling them the democrats did the same thing he went on and on about how that is different. (but never explained how)


29 posted on 02/15/2016 3:04:35 PM PST by cableguymn (We need a redneck in the white house....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
So, according to this law professor, Cruz should recuse himself from any consideration of the next Supreme Court justice because there is an issue concerning Cruz (his natural-born status) which could result in a lawsuit (which has not yet been filed), and that lawsuit could wind up at the Supreme Court.


30 posted on 02/15/2016 3:06:28 PM PST by ojeffers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Another liberal professor offers up his opinion, and I could care less.
31 posted on 02/15/2016 3:07:35 PM PST by Major Matt Mason (Those that can, do, those that can't, work in the Beltway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
What a pantload. This guy is a perfesser?

Steven Lubet is a legal scholar and author. Lubet is the Edna B. and Ednyfed H. Williams Memorial Professor of Law at Northwestern University.

32 posted on 02/15/2016 3:08:31 PM PST by COBOL2Java (I'll vote for Jeb when Terri Schiavo endorses him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: grania

It’s not something he can fix.

One is either NATURALLY a US citizen because one is born here of citizen parents and cannot possibly be any other or one is not.
If one is born with foreign citizenships, by place of birth or parentage, one cannot be a natural born citizen.

Fig leaf Senate resolutions are a political fix, but do not change the meaning of the words.

McCain’s resolution came at the price of not questioning The Usurper, too high a price in my estimation.


33 posted on 02/15/2016 3:09:13 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If Republicans dont stop it ,I ll vote against every republican i can in Virginia. Also an investigation needs to start on Scalia’s death. Who ever isfound guilty should be executed for Treason. No matter who it is.


34 posted on 02/15/2016 3:11:48 PM PST by Carry me back (.Cut the feds by 90%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caver

Again, Obama shows that he is not knowledgeable on the Constitution. The Senate does not have a duty to “confirm” his nominee. Their duty is to advise and consent, if consent is warranted. They have no duty to give consent on any of his nominees, they can withhold consent. Every day Obama shows that he is an affirmative action president.


35 posted on 02/15/2016 3:13:06 PM PST by falcon99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Cruz has all the right enemies.

Trump has all the wrong enemies.


36 posted on 02/15/2016 3:16:35 PM PST by lonestar67 (I remember when unemployment was 4.7 percent / Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Any such hearings would give Cruz a tremendous opportunity to gain votes for his campaign — which is why I doubt McConnell will permit any hearings


37 posted on 02/15/2016 3:16:46 PM PST by faithhopecharity ("Politicians are not born, they're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 -- 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

There could be a danger to Cruz’ candidacy if McConnell reverses himself on scheduling hearings.

*****************

I doubt that any hearings will be scheduled prior to knowing who the GOP
nominee will be. The GOP convention is scheduled for July 18-21, 2016.


38 posted on 02/15/2016 3:19:20 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: falcon99
The Senate does not have a duty to “confirm” his nominee. Their duty is to advise and consent, if consent is warranted. They have no duty to give consent on any of his nominees, they can withhold consent. Every day Obama shows that he is an affirmative action president.

Exactly right. If the Senate refuses to take up the nomination, nobody's going to stop them.

39 posted on 02/15/2016 3:26:34 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Cruz, however, has an unresolvable conflict of interest in this matter, which should disqualify him from participating directly in the proceedings.”

Bulltickie, when I want expert constitutional law opinions from the likes of CNN I will visit my local kindergarten.

BTW I love Ted Cruz and want to see him as President Cruz but I would LOVE to see him as Supreme Court Justice Ted Cruz


40 posted on 02/15/2016 3:50:47 PM PST by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson