Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My Observations of the Republican Primary (Part Deux)
Fedupjohn

Posted on 02/21/2016 9:44:15 AM PST by fedupjohn

Part Deux

It is well known that the Establishments whole master plan was
Plan A = Bush
Plan B = Rubio
Plan C = Brokered Convention and a Mitt Romney floor nomination

Their problem now is that Rubio is their last man standing.

Now, how do they win a brokered convention and nominate Mitt Romney
so he can lose to Hillary Clinton to keep the status quo?

You need enough of minor players with Delegates to prevent either Trump/Cruz
from winning the nomination on the 1st ballot.

But, all I see is that all of their infantry has been taken out and now
Hitler(The Establishment) has to use the last reserve Panzer Division(Romney) against
the 82nd Airborne (Trump/Cruz) at the (Ardennes for the Final Battle of the Bulge) SEC Primary Day.

Their problem is Romney isn't a Panzer he is a Pansy, politically
and Trump is a Patton.

There is another element in this equation; let's return to 2010.

Marco Rubio ran as an Anti-Establishment Tea Party Candidate against Party Hack Charlie Crist.

Who helped get him elected?...Sarah Palin...and what did he do when got to Washington?
He promptly stabbed her and the Tea Party in the back and joined the Establishment.

I don't know about you, but I don't think she forgot about that!

In my opinion, the Establishment has been deliberately driven
to having to back a very flawed and easily taken down candidate with Rubio.

Now all Sarah Palin has to do is not even Campaign for either Trump or Cruz
but just campaign against Rubio and remind everyone of how much of a lying weasel he is!

Now to me this is how you play Cut-Throat Poker!

Just my opinion

Fedupjohn


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: palin; romney; rubio; trump

1 posted on 02/21/2016 9:44:16 AM PST by fedupjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fedupjohn

I’m still backing Cruz. He’s as tough as Trump but withmore grace.


2 posted on 02/21/2016 9:49:04 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fedupjohn
Now, how do they win a brokered convention and nominate Mitt Romney so he can lose to Hillary Clinton to keep the status quo?

If there is a they will find it. If not they will manufacture it. Too much at steak for the NWO Chablis and Brie crowd.

3 posted on 02/21/2016 9:54:30 AM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

way


4 posted on 02/21/2016 9:55:03 AM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

steak=stake


5 posted on 02/21/2016 9:55:32 AM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

need kauphy


6 posted on 02/21/2016 9:55:51 AM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fedupjohn

Rubio has said he’s not going to run for re-election to the Senate, but he has until sometime in June to get on the ballot.

Wouldn’t surprise me to see him reverse himself on that like he did on amnesty.


7 posted on 02/21/2016 10:17:12 AM PST by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

MUDDOG, I agree!


8 posted on 02/21/2016 10:20:28 AM PST by fedupjohn (America...Designed by Geniuses...Now inhabited by Idiots..Palin 2016...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Don Corleone I agree!


9 posted on 02/21/2016 10:21:37 AM PST by fedupjohn (America...Designed by Geniuses...Now inhabited by Idiots..Palin 2016...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fedupjohn

Yes, Phyllis and Sarah can take Rubio out.


10 posted on 02/21/2016 10:21:46 AM PST by Lopeover (2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
I'm still backing Cruz. He's as tough as Trump but with more grace."

Cruz is not eligible. Born in a foreign land to a foreign father. He is NOT a natural born Citizen.

11 posted on 02/21/2016 10:26:14 AM PST by Godebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Nah, make it Cafe. Lol


12 posted on 02/21/2016 10:52:14 AM PST by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Godebert
Cruz is not eligible. Born in a foreign land to a foreign father. He is NOT a natural born Citizen.

Baloney. He has an American mother.

13 posted on 02/23/2016 4:56:07 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Note the reference to Natural Law in the first sentence of our Declaration of Independence.

It is crystal clear that the Founding Fathers used the Natural Law definition of 'natural born Citizen' when they wrote Article II. By invoking "The Laws of Nature and Nature's God" the 56 signers of the Declaration incorporated a legal standard of freedom into the forms of government that would follow.

President John Quincy Adams, writing in 1839, looked back at the founding period and recognized the true meaning of the Declaration's reliance on the "Laws of Nature and of Nature's God." He observed that the American people's "charter was the Declaration of Independence. Their rights, the natural rights of mankind. Their government, such as should be instituted by the people, under the solemn mutual pledges of perpetual union, founded on the self-evident truth's proclaimed in the Declaration."

The Constitution, Vattel, and “Natural Born Citizen”: What Our Framers Knew

The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God: The True Foundation of American Law

The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term “natural born citizen” to any other category than “those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof”.

MINOR V. HAPPERSETT IS BINDING PRECEDENT AS TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL DEFINITION OF A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.

Neither the 14th Amendment nor Wong Kim Ark make one a Natural Born Citizen

The Harvard Law Review Article Taken Apart Piece by Piece and Utterly Destroyed

Citizenship Terms Used in the U.S. Constitution - The 5 Terms Defined & Some Legal Reference to Same

"The citizenship of no man could be previous to the declaration of independence, and, as a natural right, belongs to none but those who have been born of citizens since the 4th of July, 1776."....David Ramsay, 1789.

A Dissertation on Manner of Acquiring Character & Privileges of Citizen of U.S.-by David Ramsay-1789

The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law (1758)

The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God: The True Foundation of American Law

Publications of the Colonial Society of Massachusetts, Volume 20 - Use of The Law of Nations by the Constitutional Convention

14 posted on 02/23/2016 9:37:42 AM PST by Godebert (CRUZ: Born in a foreign land to a foreign father.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson