[Cincinatus' Wife]

The Left always tells you who they fear the most.

Famous Liberal Inadvertently Tells Republicans EXACTLY Why They Should Vote for 'Dangerous' Cruz

Robert Reich, former Secretary of Labor in the Clinton Administration, has created a video in which he warns Democrats why Ted Cruz is far more "dangerous" than Donald Trump.

In other words, Reich, who serves as Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley, all but endorsed Cruz as the candidate of choice for conservatives.

As he spoke, he drew pictures of Cruz and Trump on a flip-chart and jotted down what he considers to be Cruz's "dangerous" positions:

[Buckeye McFrog]

Yeah, like Marco has coattails.....that’s rich!

[goldstategop]

Cruz? The guy can’t win over conservative voters.

How he is going to win over Independents and Democrats?

Ain’t gonna happen.

[ChildOfThe60s]

Alarm bells from Robert Reich, the pint sized Marxist, is a resume enhancer for a conservative.

[marron]

Wow. You couldn’t ask for a better endorsement than this if you paid for it.

[scooby321]

But with Rubio GOP would pick up 15 seats I am sure

Even though after the first debate with Hillary

It will be over

[20yearsofinternet]

Is this one video from a lib at Salon really the best evidence you can come up with that “the Left” fears Ted Cruz above all else? A quick look at the Salon frontpage, and I see it’s littered with articles about how Trump is the coming of Satan incarnate (which you’ll probably now submit here for other reasons).

I also see one article about how Cruz’s campaign has failed.

So, one guy thinks Ted Cruz is really terrible, therefore everyone should vote for Ted?

Seems like tilting at windmills to me, and the full body of evidence suggests that Trump is who the left actually fears.

[mrsmith]

The down-ticket races would be affected by the big donors sending money to candidates who promise to fight the changes Cruz/Trump have promised.

Anti-Cruz/Trump candidates would be rolling in dough,,, and, as this article shows, the media won’t tell anyone that’s what is going on.

[IllumiNaughtyByNature]

More Boogie Man B.S. #onlytheestablishmentGOPcansaveus lol.

[mazda77]

This Peter Schorsch?

http://www.tampabay.com/news/publicsafety/crime/no-charges-to-be-filed-against-blogger-peter-schorsch-after-sheriffs/2170329

[DoughtyOne]

[Yulee]

Today's editorial by our New York Times owned local states the following: “Donald Trump, for example, is an unorthodox Republican, having stated beliefs that Democrats share, and which his GOP primary foes attack as too liberal. Despite running to be the Democratic nominee, Sen. Bernie Sanders is a declared independent and has won elections as a minor-party or independent candidate for nearly 50 years. And were it not for her last name, Hillary Clinton�€™s Wall Street ties, muscle-bound foreign policy and support for free-trade deals would be welcome in many GOP circles.”

I have a feeling our local New York times mouthpiece will endorse Sanders, especially since they fail to mention that the “independent candidate for nearly 50 years” is a communist. They paint Hillary as right wing, and Trump as liberal.

The longer people read these editorials without questioning the motives behind them, the longer the low information voters will vote in those who will do them ill.

[Harpotoo]

With all the yankees in FL the down ticket folks will do just fine!-)

[who_would_fardels_bear]

Trump / Omarosa!

[LongWayHome]

Republicans are going to the polls in much greater numbers than democrats so far this year. That’s reality on the ground.

[Bruce Campbells Chin]

I think the premise of the article is correct. Risk-averse voters nervous about Trump or Cruz are much more likely to ticket-split, which could kill us in the Senate.

[Lazamataz]

You are a paid Establishment / Elitist operative.

[DoodleDawg]

As with anything else, the Florida race will depend mostly on the candidate. If the Democrats go with Alan Grayson then the Florida seat should be safe.