Yep, he is.
But remember that Cruz HAS TO win a number of states in the upcoming “Super Tuesday” primaries or he is done.
|
If you would like to be added to the
|
GGG, out of your cage early today!
BFD
I have three members of my family that like Cruz and dislike Trump ( personally ), but have accepted that Trump would be the better candidate to defeat Hillary. I think a big mistake on Cruz’s part, was to run as a “Fundamentalist”, when running as a “Conservative”, would have served him better.
I am not looking for an “Anti-Trump” candidate. I am looking for a candidate that can stop the harridan legacy of a corrupt presidency. I am looking for a candidate that can stop our quisling, ball-less RINO Congress from capitulating to Democrats because of the threat of ‘bad media’ and ‘optics’ or loss of Sunday Morning news-puke appearances.
I am looking for a candidate that will not legalize invaders and allow them to become citizen voters, not offer some frigging ‘plan’ to implement reform. Here’s a novel ‘plan’ — enforce some f@cking laws that are already on the books!
I’m not interested in listening to a supporter whose only arsenal is heel-nips against Trump instead of showing how his candidate can make our RINOs grow some b@lls and put these socialists and concern freaks back in their rightful cage.
He’s correct.
Cruz support is far more likely to go to Trump than Rubio (although Trump’s childish behavior of late may prevent that).
The answer is for Rubio to back off and agree to be Cruz’s VP and for the entirety of others to get behind Cruz.
I doubt, however, the RINO elite can get behind a real conservative. I think they’d rather have one who plays one on TV. Trump is much more malleable to their desires.
“Donald Trump continues to amaze. Wednesday afternoon, he strode onto the Regent University stage (an influential Christian University) and received a prolonged standing ovation from the evangelical audience. He went on to speak eloquently about the importance of family (he even brought out his two sons who spoke highly of him), nominating pro-life judges, defending Israel, etc. After hearing what he had to say, he left over an hour later to another standing ovation. I saw it with my own two eyes. I was there as the moderator of this presidential forum. After seeing those evangelicals rise to their feet, I thought to myself how Ted Cruz must be downing huge Alka-Seltzer tablets as we speak. After all, it was Cruz who was supposed to get all the love from evangelicals. Instead, Trump has invaded his turf. What happened?”
Hey GGG, do you have any Alka-Seltzer handy? As the article says, what happened? Cruz won’t even carry Texas next week.
How about being something other than the “anti”?
Cruz is finished and has no chance to win the nomination. Time for you guys to move on. That’s what happens when you throw in with Glenn Beck and campaign to only conservative evangelicals who don’t vote for you anyway.
Cruz and Rubio combined did not beat Trump in Nevada.
So much for anti-Trump.
will you be comparing Trump to Hitler today?
or is this all you got?
Unfortunately, the establishment hates Cruz so much, it appears they’d rather have Trump or Hillary win the White House just to keep him out of it.
Well, that's why he's a lousy anti-Trump. Once he gets away from his core support, not enough people like him.
In any case, I'd have preferred Rubio or Cruz to Trump, but it ain't happening for either. It would be a very near thing even of everyone got out except for one of those guys, and that's not happening anyway.
Trump has this in the bag - it's just too late.
Thanks for the post. Had never seen that website before.
Some great contributors there!!!
Of course he is. Conservative Review rates Cruz at 97 percent, Rubio at 79.
TED CRUZ: U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, Hearing, 5/21/13:
"And I'd like to make a final point to those advocacy groups that are very engaged in this issue and rightly concerned about addressing our immigration system and, in particular, about addressing the situation for the 11 million who are currently in the shadows. If this amendment is adopted to the current bill, the effect would be that those 11 million under this current bill would still be eligible for RPI status. They would still be eligible for legal status and indeed, under the terms of the bill, they would be eligible for LPR status as well so that they are out of the shadows, which the proponents of this bill repeatedly point to as their principal objective to provide a legal status for those who are here illegally to be out of the shadows. This amendment would allow that happen, but what it would do is remove the pathway to citizenship so that there are real consequences that respect the rule of law and that treat legal immigrants with the fairness and respect they deserve. And a second point to those advocacy groups that are so passionately engaged. In my view, if this committee rejects this amendment, and I think everyone here views it as quite likely this committee will choose to reject this amendment, in my view, that decision will make it much, much more likely that this entire bill will fail in the House of Representatives. I don't want immigration reform to fail. I want immigration reform to pass. And so I would urge people of good faith on both sides of the aisle, if the objective is to pass common sense immigration reform that secures the borders, that improves legal immigration, and AMNESTY: that allows those who are here illegally to come in out of the shadows.Then we should look for areas of bipartisan agreement and compromised to come together. And this amendment, I believe, if this amendment were to pass, the chances of this bill passing into law would increase dramatically."