Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge: 'You're not allowed to record cops'
Oregon Live ^ | Feb 27,2016 | By Eder Campuzano

Posted on 02/27/2016 1:29:27 PM PST by NoLibZone

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: sagar
Because federalizing the police always works out so well for every one....

Except of course those not in the government.

You anti-history oxygen thief's amuse me.

41 posted on 02/27/2016 2:30:28 PM PST by SERE_DOC ( The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it. T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sagar

What a gov’t/big brother boot-lick!

We’re headed towards worldwide tyranny because folks like you refuse to question your overlords and go along to get along.


42 posted on 02/27/2016 2:31:01 PM PST by Roman_War_Criminal (What to do? Vote for a Dominionist or an Atheist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
Judge Mark Kearney... a traitor to the United States of America and the U.S. Constitution.

And, to no surprise, Traitorcongress will do.................................................. nothing.

43 posted on 02/27/2016 2:33:38 PM PST by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: sagar

Protecting law enforcement from harassment.....Where, exactly was the harassment?


44 posted on 02/27/2016 2:35:29 PM PST by Safetgiver (Islam makes barbarism look genteel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sagar

the act of systematic and/or continued unwanted and annoying actions.


45 posted on 02/27/2016 2:39:47 PM PST by Safetgiver (Islam makes barbarism look genteel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sagar

Recording = Interfering ??????


46 posted on 02/27/2016 2:40:37 PM PST by samtheman (Trump For America! Cruzio for Rubio!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

crazy eyed canine toothed


47 posted on 02/27/2016 2:43:45 PM PST by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

I’ll record and they can kiss my ass!

F U S C!


48 posted on 02/27/2016 2:47:26 PM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
Judge Mark Kearney

Villanova grad, career southeastern PA shyster, got that move along Johnny, tell your troubles to Jesus look.

49 posted on 02/27/2016 2:48:52 PM PST by Stentor (Oh Teddy Cruz, Canadian that you be. Oh Teddy Cruz, we stand on guard for thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Sure sounds bizarre, as such criticism would be assumed. And even if it did not exist it does now.


50 posted on 02/27/2016 2:52:22 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

I hope they appeal this one. I think this “no photos” stuff is very dangerous. It includes everything from government officials not wanting to be photographed in the course of their duties to political candidates not wanting to be photographed at particular events or insisting on being photographed, even by the press, from a particular flattering angle, etc. it’s getting crazier and crazier and more and more repressive.


51 posted on 02/27/2016 2:56:55 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oberon

Public servants, performing their public duties, in public, have no right to privacy where those duties are concerned. Off the job they’re private citizens, but on the job they’re fair game.


^ This, and I will add being paid from the public treasury.


52 posted on 02/27/2016 3:04:33 PM PST by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Pings my GAYDAR pretty hard.


53 posted on 02/27/2016 3:08:00 PM PST by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

How is photographing the police “interfering with law enforcement.”
= = =

Photographing a person can “Steal their Soul”.

And that is theft.


54 posted on 02/27/2016 3:20:12 PM PST by Scrambler Bob (As always, /s is implicitly assumed. Unless explicitly labled /not s. Saves keystrokes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


55 posted on 02/27/2016 3:20:34 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

Recording is not interfering.
= = =

It is interfering if you are able to record the truth.

Then the cops cannot tell their normal lies, which interferes with normal cop business.

See, recording IS interfering.


56 posted on 02/27/2016 3:23:37 PM PST by Scrambler Bob (As always, /s is implicitly assumed. Unless explicitly labled /not s. Saves keystrokes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345

I love your brain.


57 posted on 02/27/2016 3:25:50 PM PST by Scrambler Bob (As always, /s is implicitly assumed. Unless explicitly labled /not s. Saves keystrokes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

They always tell you not to record the police when you to got a totalitarian or communist country.


58 posted on 02/27/2016 3:36:05 PM PST by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

> Recording is not interfering.

Unlike classical constitutional reasoning this must be a quantum mechanical court decision... measuring something causes it be changed.


59 posted on 02/27/2016 3:39:26 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
SCOTUS has already ruled on this. The judge will be slapped down.

That's what I thought. This is easy peasy anyway. It's always for evidence.

60 posted on 02/27/2016 3:42:21 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson