These people seem bitter and would rather see Hillary.
Anyone who votes for Hillary Clinton and claims to be a republican is a lying SOB...Period...
Or, they are tired of holding their nose and voting for someone they find repulsive. A vote for Cruz is a vote for Glenn Beck... yuck.
What I was saying elsewhere - that the big donors, once Jeb Bush was no longer in the race, they would switch their funding DIRECTLY to Herself, or any of the PACs that are acting on behalf of Herself.
Since Jeb was the designated loser ANYWAY, anything that pushed him to the forefront could only help Herself. This way, the transfer of money and influence is much more direct, and probably a more efficient distribution of the funds involved, more bang for the buck.
Herself is, in her fashion, so much WORSE than the very worst day Nixon ever had, and is reputed to have absolutely despised Nixon. Others may document this statement in whatever way they wish. But for loathing Nixon so very much, Herself is trying very, very hard to emulate the least attractive attributes of the 37th President.
Besides, the state of health that Herself enjoys is a a little shaky, and may result in early withdrawal from the race. Herself may be a pretty uncertain reed to lean upon.
Maybe they actually believe that, born in Canada to a Cuban father, Cruz isn't eligible.
If that's their criteria, then they aren't "bitter" for not supporting Cruz.
Instead, they're just being Constitutional first, political second.
I have an awful confession to make; but I was as fundamentally correct then as I believe I am now. The year was 1992, and the national conversations prior to that.
George H.W. Bush had uttered his now famous words, "Read my lips, no new taxes!" (unfortunately, written by my favorite political participant/observer/writer Peggy Noonan).
That phrase solidified my determination NOT TO VOTE FOR BUSH under any circumstances. The alternative was a poison pill for my decision, but my anger led to the decision : OK this will be at least a 4-year disaster, but I was willing to do it, thinking that it would be so bad that it would ban the Democrats for at least two presidential cycles.
I was basically correct, but Clinton fooled me (and everyone else) by not listening to Hillary, and moderating his tendency to yield to the GOPe on issues that really mattered. Smart. It made his re-election possible, with the help of an also smart Republican Congress.
Am I making the same mistake again? Most will probably say yes, but the duplicity of the current duplicity of the GOPe doing everything they cn to take out Trump is almost keeping me awake at night.
Incidentally, has everyone listened to Rush Limbaugh today (Tues Mar 8, 2016?) He has been discussing the big secret meeting of politicians at some East Coast offshore island including one "news" type and dozens of politicians of both parties, political wonks, technical Silicon Valley technical companies all gathered exclusively to decide "How do we stop Trump?"
This has raised several transcendental questions in my mind :
Does this meeting constitute conspiracy to deny Trump his Constitutional rights and protection?
Can this constitute a RICO violation? Are serving politicians immune?
Can Trump either sue the individually those attending or file a RICO violation Complaint?
Time to let the dogs out!