Skip to comments.Hillary's Right Not A "Single" Person Lost In Libya
Posted on 03/16/2016 11:01:18 AM PDT by raptor22
Hillary Clinton attempted to defend her vote for the invasion of Iraq after her husband Bill signed the 1998 Iraq Liberation Act calling for regime change in Iraq, and she tried to draw a distinction between President George W. Bushs toppling of Saddam Hussein and her toppling of Moammar Gaddafi in Libya. She failed miserably on both counts. In the process, as Yahoo Politics reports, she merely indicted her own incompetence and her callous indifference to the dead of Benghazi:
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
HILLARY BENGHAZI PING
That’s what I said yesterday. Not a single one. Four, yes. Single one, no.
The coldest, most calculating, most dishonest politician in US history.
a dirty vile insect.
No, what it means is that Hitlery has no idea that Benghazi is even in Libya.
Head bump amnesia?
If she’s President and someone nukes NYC she will make the same claim ...
The destabilization of Qaddafi,in fact resulted in all out civil war that cost thousands and thousand of lives. Does she no know that? Is she alright in the head after those falls?
Not only that, but she says the most outrageous and categorically false things that it boggles the mind how she can do it with a straight face.
In would ask G*d to have mercy upon her soul, but she doesn’t have one, so I won’t waste my time.
She is truly an evil person.
Hillary! has not told a single lie.
HILLARY BENGHAZI PING
It was all over the MSM. /s
Yet every time Trump Fa^^ts it’s headline news.
More like a putrid maggot.
I was going to say, “LOL — Chelsea’s half brother!” But then I remembered that Web Hubbel was Chelsea’s father.
"Not a single person was lost in Libya"
What is the definition of "in"? They weren't "in" Libya, they weren't buried underground, they were "on" Libya.
What is the definition of "lost"? None of the Benghazi four were "lost", they knew exactly where they were.
What is the definition of "single"? Were they single or married?
So you see, Hillary WASN'T lying!
HA HA HA HA!
Great pic! LOL
You have to parse what Herself says very, very carefully. If the engagement in Libya is based ONLY on the removal (and murder) of Muammar Gaddafi, then yes, no AMERICAN lives were lost up to that date. Herself has compartmentalized the events in Libya into separate phases, each unrelated to the last. The firefight at Benghazi was, in the mind of Herself, a completely different operation. The plan was to take back all the weaponry and munitions used to depose Gaddafi, and transship them through Turkey to the “rebel” fighters in Syria, in a continuing effort to depose Bashar al-Assad. But somebody did not get the memo, or there was a breakdown in negotiations on returning the weapons and munitions, thus the sudden resistance that arose with certain of the “freedom fighters” that had deposed Gaddafi, who did not want to give up the war materials, as they planned to launch a strike into the Saharan and sub-Saharan countries in Africa.
As you know, the attacks did go forward in Chad and Niger, so the background negotiations perhaps did not go well for Herself and her coterie of Muslim Brotherhood agents, and Herself was dismissed as Secretary of State, most conveniently, just after things went south, so to speak, in Libya. And the resupply of weaponry to the Muslim Brotherhood subsidiaries in Syria had to be routed through a different supply route, which favored the introduction of a new subsidiary of MB, the “Islamic State of Iraq and Syria”, or ISIS, to steal the weaponry from the Iraqi Sunnis, and use that as the resupply to the “rebel” forces in Syria.
Simultaneously, the Free Syrian Army was designated as the “moderate” anti-Assad “rebels”, and fresh supplies of munitions and weapons were rushed to them, only to have them taken by the ISIS militia, the “JV team”.
It is my contention that somewhere in the “deleted” e-mails on the private server maintained by Herself, is a paper trail that delineates a series of exchanges which supports this hypothesis, but is being deliberately withheld to keep up the fiction that Herself is somehow “blameless” in the whole fiasco.
Somewhere in all those documents which were supposedly “not classified”, but in actuality contains some VERY highly classified material, like “Top Secret-Eyes Only” or some closely guarded codeworded intelligence reports, under all the deletions, the real story lies.
The Russians, the Chinese, and the Iranians already know. What the heck, perhaps the Israelis know too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.