Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/20/2016 1:27:50 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Lorianne

I prefer scorched earth...


2 posted on 04/20/2016 1:29:23 PM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Bam-bam Bammy wants to go out with a little more “bam?”


3 posted on 04/20/2016 1:29:33 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (The would-be Empress has no clothes. My eyes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Trump just said no more warning leaflets,truck drivers will be having a bad day


4 posted on 04/20/2016 1:32:22 PM PDT by Donglalinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

PLAY IT LIKE IT’S WW2
OR
GENREAL SHERMAN PARADE ACROSS GA

burn baby burn
let us knwo when you’re DONE.......


6 posted on 04/20/2016 1:34:07 PM PDT by zzwhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

The Pentagon has approved airstrikes that risk more civilian casualties in order to destroy Islamic State targets

Boy, I would be getting out of the White House now If I worked there.


7 posted on 04/20/2016 1:34:50 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

I see another Nobel Peace Prize in the not so distant future.


8 posted on 04/20/2016 1:40:10 PM PDT by printhead (Standard & Poor - Poor is the new standard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

There is no traditional military there. With the exception of the Syrian army and the Russians, the fighters are entirely civilians. You can’t tell the fighters from the people shopping in the bazar. Truth be told, the shoppers would like all non-Muslims just as dead as much as the fighters do. Islam is not compatible with anything westerners consider civilization. Multiculturalism to a Muslim means he considers the non-Muslim a slave.


9 posted on 04/20/2016 1:41:27 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Dresden sounds like a good model, if it is enough to break the enemy’s will.


10 posted on 04/20/2016 1:48:15 PM PDT by null and void ("when authority began inspiring contempt, it had stopped being authority" ~ H. Beam Piper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Unfortunate, but there has never been a war without civilian casualties. We should never seek them, but we shouldn’t let the possibility of them stop us from cleaning out the jihadists once and for all.

Even this plan is only a small step forward. I would do much more.


12 posted on 04/20/2016 3:52:19 PM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Fu*kin about time. ISIS is embedded in the major cities they hold so rooting them out one by one is going to be very bloody for Iraqi and allied forces. Once ISIS fighters know that we will take out a city block to eliminate them in their houses and bunkers, they will rethink their devotion to dying in a one-sided fight.

I’m all for trying NOT to hurt or kill civilians in a war, but it happens. We should try our best not to hit them, but war is hell and the enemy must be not only defeated, but physically eliminated from this earth.

Daisy cutter bombs, napalm, and even limited carpet bombing are all actual or potential weapons we can use on viable targets. Time to fight a “war”, not a “police action”.

Crispy critter time, again.


14 posted on 04/20/2016 4:30:30 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson