Posted on 04/24/2016 5:28:56 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
I think I saw that movie.....
Travis, I feel the same way myself.
The most fun I have had in Target in the past is wearing a concealed Kimber 3” .45 when in the store. Nothing like breaking the rules/wishes of this cheese eating surrender monkey owned business. Not that I will be walking into one of their stores in the future.
More compromise and appeasement. We do not need to “understand” Target or the perverts they have enabled. This is NOT a complicated social issue with a host of subtle nuances that need to be dissected under a microscope. This is simply another attempt by the Humanist Left to usurp Nature and redefine “normal.” And a tale of the corporate cowardice that empowers a miniscule collection of sexual deviants by risking the sanctity of our children.
Target has demonstrated that in a battle of morality, they stand with the forces of evil. A boycott is a fitting and proper response to that stance.
Simply require the person to be dressed as the gender they are ‘identifying’ as that day. That will solve the problem.
Predators hide behind the mask of being normal productive citizens, its how they gain trust and access to targets. Making them dress as a transvestite to be allowed in the womens room would put a damper on random dudes camping in the ladies room for sure.
My female co-workers describe much worse conditions in the ladies’ room, so I won’t guess as to who is more gross. I simply mentioned it as a working solution.
One of the big, unstated secrets is that the type of men that want to use the women’s restrooms really, really, really hate women for being naturally what they aren’t. So they walk in and find their ‘nemesis’ (real women) in, shall we say, compromising positions and their aggressive nature will get the better of them.
Lots of lib women now saying they are uncomfortable with men in their bathrooms, not that it would be enough to make them back off their talking points, though.
Target should be run out of business. They are the enemies of America and Christians everywhere.
Good for you; it is a solution that works with one of the densest populations of sexual deviants in the world.
“I would even go to the point of getting a license to carry a concealed weapon if the state I lived in allows that.”
Target’s official policy is to no allow CC in its stores. Its CEO says:
” it boils down to a simple belief: Bringing firearms to Target creates an environment that is at odds with the family-friendly shopping and work experience we strive to create.”
Isn’t that a laugh? Allowing perverts into women’s restrooms allows a ‘family-friendly’ experience?
https://corporate.target.com/article/2014/07/target-addresses-firearms-in-stores
I trust appropriately gendered Target **Security** personnel like I trust the TSA.
I would guess that the vast majority of Target shoppers are women. My wife and her friends love Target. My wife will no longer be driving the extra few miles to shop at Target. I’m sure most women are concerned about this insanity too.
I started my Target boycott when they banned the Salvation Christmas bell ringers.
Me too! These PC retailers do this BECAUSE people don’t refuse to shop at their stores.
Everywhere is freaks and hairies
Dykes and fairies, tell me where is sanity
Tax the rich, feed the poor
‘Til there are no rich no more
I’d love to change the world
But I don’t know what to do
So I’ll leave it up to you
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBAwv49slC8
OK, I have read this column several times. It seems that the “better alternative” is to trust Target to provide security in their toilet rooms.
Really?
Target hasn’t offered any plan for doing that, but we’re just supposed to trust them? We’re supposed to believe there will be Target employees who will drop what they’re doing to come into the toilet room and kick somebody out?
That ain’t gonna happen. This column is not well thought out.
That would settle the science for me. I’d never walk in that store.
heck, Saudi Arabia could ban LGBT from using the wrong bathroom and the LGBT would not complain. O wait, they kill LGBT people, where is the anger there> too busy hunting down Christians to bake you a cake LGBT?
Businesses will either pay for it or close; that was how “non-smoking” sections were developed.
It may not be a perfect solution, but it works.
Just by requiring less space it could be CHEAPER. One restroom is maintained instead of two.
As for cameras, why would that be an issue in an area solely composed of sinks, mirrors, and trashcans? It would alleviate security issues people have raised (and they wouldn’t be in the individual “rooms”).
The San Francisco solution is much better than a free-for-all in which weirdos can opt for the opposite gender’s bathrooms; THAT is creepy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.