Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/28/2016 12:03:54 PM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: Stand Watch Listen

as discussed here last night

http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3425300/posts?q=1&;page=1#1


57 posted on 04/28/2016 4:06:28 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - Luke, 22:36)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stand Watch Listen

My biggest argument towards the F-35 is it is a single engine aircraft, especially for a low and slow ground attack role.
If one engine goes out for whatever reason, it’s down.

The A-10, F-15 and F-22 are superior for that reason only, not to mention the myriad of other problems the F-35 has encountered during it’s production history.

I understand that the F-35 was intended to be a JSF (Joint Strike Fighter) not only for the US, but for many of our allies, but that is a huge role for a single engine aircraft to achieve.

The F-35 will never replace all of the roles the A-10, F-15 and F-22 not to mention the Harrier and the F-16 within one airframe, especially if it is single engine.

An aircraft that expects to be the best in every role, is relegated to be mediocre, at best, in any role, most notably if it is single engine.

I feel the Pentagon must re-evaluate the F-35 before relegating current inventories to the trash heap.


59 posted on 04/28/2016 8:36:17 PM PDT by Blaksle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson