Explaining Hillary Clinton's Lost Ground in the Polls

New York Times ^ | May 24, 2016 | by Nate Cohn

[Biggirl]

The reality is that Hillary is being attacked first by Bernie and the Bernie people and now Trump has declared war on Hillary.

[catnipman]

“Explaining Hillary Clinton’s Lost Ground in the Polls”

it’s just bad luck: it’s a blip and she’ll bounce back, right NYT?

[DPMD]

Bush and Climate Change.

[Harpotoo]

Plus who wants to hear the demented beeyatch going woof woof woof for 4 years:-)

[GOPJ]

Can we pay the dem butt-kissers at the New York Times to do another lame hit piece on Trump while TOTALLY ignoring criminal accusations against the Clintons?

Please oh please... can the New York Times highlight their bias and hatred of traditional Americans just one MORE TIME? That works for US and against the Clintons.

Shameful bias helps bump Trump's numbers up... and pushes Clinton's down. Too much love from indulgent parents for their bratty child... doesn't make the kid popular.

Hey New York Times Editors... Can WE play you too?

One of the things that 'happened' Nate Cohn is the NEW YORK TIMES ran a biased hate piece against Trump while ignoring CRIMINAL accusations against the Clintons...AND THE PEOPLE NOTICED. You guys aren't gatekeepers anymore.. we have other new sources for news... places that aren't biased and hateful... That's what's hurting Clinton... your creepy indulgence...

[catnipman]

BTW, the comments at the NYT about this article are very educational. The overwhelming sentiment is anti-Clinton, though clearly most of those commenting are Democrats/”Progressvies”.

[LS]

Try “Crooked Hillary.” Since Trump began using that, she has plummeted.

[Verginius Rufus]

Governor Hickenlooper of Colorado, a Hillary supporter, was asked this morning why Hillary does so poorly on the "honest and trustworthy" question and he explained that it was all because of the attacks on her this year in the Republican primaries.

The primaries were a long time ago but I mostly recall the Republican candidates attacking each other, not Hillary.

[Robert A Cook PE]

Ugly.
Hate-filled.
Corrupt.
Shrill.
Painful to hear, watch, and think about.

Gee NYTimes. ANything else we’ve forgotten?

Are they THAT self-infatuated that they don’t know what the rest of the country thinks?

[Robert A Cook PE]

Wow.

Where is that list of bribes from?

[Liz]

zerohedge.com compiled the bribe list.

[1Old Pro]

The good news for Mrs. Clinton is that there’s a lot of room for improvement

Now that's putting lipstick on a pig.

[Bubba Gump Shrimp]

Yeah, it’s odd, I follow a lot of different articles, and you will see a swell of various Bernie people ripping into Hillary, then all of the sudden, like half a dozen Clinton supporters show up, and make post after post, I mean dozens of posts each attacking Bernie, shoring up Hillary and attacking Trump, which is odd, because they are the only ones who bring up Trump.

But they will be on for hours arguing with anyone they can, and eventually they just take over the comments section while everyone else moves on.

I think it’s pretty obvious they must work for some marketing company employed by the Clinton campaign, and I think this too will backfire on her, modern voters are pretty savvy and can spot this stuff the same as I do, and they (we) don’t like to feel like we are being manipulated.

[catnipman]

“I think it’s pretty obvious they must work for some marketing company employed by the Clinton campaign”

Indeed:

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/04/22/pro-hillary-pac-spending-1-million-to-hire-online-trolls/